Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35272652›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Engagement with protective behaviours in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a series of cross-sectional surveys (the COVID-19 rapid survey of adherence to interventions and responses [CORSAIR] study).

Louise E Smith, Henry W W Potts, Richard Amlȏt, Nicola T Fear, Susan Michie, G James Rubin

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Louise E SmithDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, England. louise.e.smith@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1277-2564
Henry W W PottsUniversity College London, Institute of Health Informatics, 222 Euston Road, London, NW1 2DA, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6200-8804
Richard AmlȏtNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, London, England.
Nicola T FearDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5792-2925
Susan MichieCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0063-6378
G James RubinDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, England.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research 11/46/21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBehaviour is key to suppressing the COVID-19 pandemic. Maintaining behaviour change can be difficult. We investigated engagement with hand cleaning, reducing the number of outings, and wearing a face covering over the course of the pandemic.

methodsWe used a series of 64 cross-sectional surveys between 10 February 2020 and 20 January 2022 (n ≈ 2000 per wave). Surveys investigated uptake of hand cleaning behaviours, out of home activity (England only, n ≈ 1700 per wave) and wearing a face covering (England only, restricted to those who reported going out shopping in the last week, n ≈ 1400 per wave).

resultsReported hand cleaning has been high throughout the pandemic period (85 to 90% of participants consistently reporting washing their hands thoroughly and regularly with soap and water frequently or very frequently). Out of home activity has mirrored the easing and re-introduction of restrictive measures. Total number of outings were higher in the second national lockdown than in the first and third lockdowns. Wearing a face covering increased steadily between April to August 2020, plateauing until the end of measurement in May 2021, with approximately 80% of those who had been out shopping in the previous week reporting wearing a face covering frequently or very frequently.

conclusionsEngagement with protective behaviours increased at the start of the pandemic and has remained high since. The greatest variations in behaviour reflected changes to Government rules. Despite the duration of restrictions, people have continued to adopt personal protective behaviours that were intended to prevent the spread of COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza, HumanCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2United KingdomBehavioural fatigueFace coveringHand cleaningHand hygienePhysical distancingSocial distancingUptake

Identifiers

PMID35272652
PMCPMC8907902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.