ArticleBMC primary care2022
An insight into patients' perspectives on barriers affecting participation in shared decision making among patients with diabetes mellitus in Malawi.
Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Shared decision-making in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of patients' preferences and healthcare providers' perspectives.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Perception of physiotherapy researchers about patient and public involvement in health research design and planning in Nigeria.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Patients as Partners in Sickle Cell Disease Research in Africa: A Framework for Equitable Patient-Engaged Health Research.The patient · 2026Article
- 'I don't think they involve me in any way': Qualitative study of patient centrality in chronic non-communicable disease management in Ghana.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- "The Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Community Is Not Just Minoritised But Ignored": Engaging Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Communities in Australia With Blood-Borne Viruses and Sexually Transmissible Infections Healthcare.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Perception of patient-centred care and its relationship with management outcomes and complications among patients with DM in Malawi.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Exploration of clinical ethics consultation in Uganda: a case study of Uganda Cancer Institute.BMC medical ethics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient participation in decision making is a basic tenet for a patient centred care experience and, has potential to improve care experiences and responsiveness in chronic diseases such as Diabetes Mellitus (DM). However, documented experiences show that patient participation in decisions making is wanting. As Malawi strives to institutionalise patient centred care delivery, it is important to examine patients' experiences and perceptions to identify barriers affecting their participation in shared decision making because this may provide evidence supporting strategies in implementation of the institutionalisation.
aimThe study sought to describe perspectives about barriers to participation in shared decision making among patients with DM in Malawi.
methodsThis was an exploratory qualitative study. We targeted patients attending DM clinics in four public health facilities in southern Malawi from September to December 2019. We used In-Depth Interviews and Focus Group Discussions. Data was managed using Nvivo version 11 software and analysed using Content Analysis.
resultsThe study highlights the values, perceptions and benefits of shared decision making. Furthermore, patients' narratives expose the struggles and vulnerabilities in their attempts to engage their providers towards shared decision making.
conclusionInteractional power imbalances, insufficient dialogue and patients' own restrictive attitudes towards engagement with their providers thwarts SDM in clinical encounters. To make SDM a reality, transforming medical education that emphasizes on the value of good patient-provider relationship and providers' attitudes to regard patients as active partners may be a good starting point. Additionally, strategies that empower and change patients' perceptions about SDM require investment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.