Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35272503›Full record

ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2022

Evidence-Based Process Performance Measures and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Incident Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study.

Inge Schjødt, Søren P Johnsen, Anna Strömberg, Adam D DeVore, Jan B Valentin, Brian B Løgstrup

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Adherence to Pharmacotherapies After Heart Transplantation in Relation to Multimorbidity and Socioeconomic Position: A Nationwide Register-Based Study.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Inge SchjødtDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark (I.S., B.B.L.).ORCID 0000-0003-4086-2281
Søren P JohnsenDanish Center for Clinical Health Services Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark (S.P.J., J.B.V.).ORCID 0000-0002-2787-0271
Anna StrömbergDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, and Department of Cardiology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden (A.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-4259-3671
Adam D DeVoreDuke Clinical Research Institute and Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States (A.D.D.).
Jan B ValentinDanish Center for Clinical Health Services Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark (S.P.J., J.B.V.).ORCID 0000-0002-8205-7179
Brian B LøgstrupDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark (I.S., B.B.L.).ORCID 0000-0002-4218-0033

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData on the association between quality of heart failure (HF) care and outcomes among patients with incident HF are sparse. We examined the association between process performance measures and clinical outcomes in patients with incident HF with reduced ejection fraction.

methodsPatients with incident HF with reduced ejection fraction (n=10 966) between January 2008 and October 2015 were identified from the Danish HF Registry. Data from public registries were linked. Multivariable regression analyses were used to assess the association between 6 guideline-recommended HF care processes (New York Heart Association assessment, use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers, beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, exercise training, and patient education) and all-cause and HF readmission, all-cause and HF hospital days, and mortality within 3 to 12 months after HF diagnosis. The associations were analyzed according to the percentages of all relevant performance measures fulfilled for the individual patient (0%-50% [reference group], >50%-75%, and >75%-100%) and for the individual performance measures.

resultsFulfilling >75% to 100% of the performance measures (n=5341 [48.7%]) was associated with lower risk of all-cause readmission (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.68-0.89]) and HF readmission (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.54-0.92]), lower use of all-cause hospital days (adjusted mean ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.70-0.76]) and HF hospital days (adjusted mean ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.70-0.89]), and lower mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.32-0.53]). A dose-response relationship was observed between fulfilling more performance measures and mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.49-0.77] fulfilling >50%-75% of the measures). Fulfilling individual performance measures, except mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist therapy, was associated with lower adjusted all-cause readmission, lower adjusted use of all-cause and HF hospital days, and lower adjusted mortality.

conclusionsFulfilling more process performance measures was associated with better clinical outcomes in patients with incident HF with reduced ejection fraction.

Indexed as

Heart FailureAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsCohort StudiesDenmarkHumansMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsRegistriesStroke VolumeAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsMineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonistsexercisehealth careheart failuremortalitypatient readmissionprocess assessmentregistries

Identifiers

PMID35272503
PMCPMC9015036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.