ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2022
New insights into the ultrasound impact on covalent reactions of myofibrillar protein.
Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanism of emulsion stabilized by an ultrasonically prepared protein-polyphenol-polysaccharide complex: structure, functional properties and interfacial behavior.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2025Article
- Effect of sonoprocessing on the quality of plant-based analog foods: Compatibility to sustainable development goals, drawbacks and limitations.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2024Review
- Evaluation of sono-physico-chemical and processing effects in the mixed sarcoplasmic protein/soy protein isolate system.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2023Article
- A comparison of the impacts of different polysaccharides on the sono-physico-chemical consequences of ultrasonic-assisted modifications.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2023Article
- Effects of medium viscoelasticity on bubble collapse strength of interacting polydisperse bubbles.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2023Article
- Ultrasound-assisted alkaline extraction of protein from Tenebrio molitor larvae: Extraction kinetics, physiochemical, and functional traits.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2023Article
- Sonochemical Effects on the Preparation, Structure and Function of Gliadin-(-)-Epigallo-Catechin 3-Gallate Conjugates.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Effect of Thermal Processing on the Conformational and Digestive Properties of Myosin.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, two different covalent reactions, namely, alkaline reaction and free radical oxidation, were selected to compare the difference in the strengthening effects of ultrasound treatment (UDT). The grafting effects were verified by protein electrophoresis and bound gallic acid (GA) assay. Furthermore, non-covalent interactions between myofibrillar protein (MPN) aggregates were destroyed by UDT, as proved by the lower particle sizes and higher ζ-potential. Comparatively, the results from tertiary structure index and circular dichroism revealed UDT-assisted free radical oxidation could lead to better conjugates with greater structural properties. The atomic force microscope (AFME) and protein flexibility showed that MPNs appeared to display as irregular spherical particles after alkaline reaction, however, maintained fibrous structure during the free radical oxidation. Consequently, the combination of UDT and free radical oxidation were more effectively for strengthening the influence of acoustic cavitation on MPNs, of which mechanism was the changes in viscosity properties, microstructure and acoustic cavitation radicals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.