Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35272100›Full record

ArticleBody image2022

Sexual orientation differences in pathways from sociocultural and objectification constructs to body satisfaction: The U.S. Body Project I.

David A Frederick, Vivienne M Hazzard, Lauren M Schaefer, Rachel F Rodgers, Allegra R Gordon, Tracy L Tylka, Jamie-Lee Pennesi, Lexie Convertino, Michael C Parent, Tiffany A Brown and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Body image, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 15 institutions in 3 countries.

David A FrederickCrean College of Health and Behavioral Sciences, Chapman University, Orange, CA, USA. Electronic address: Enderflies1@aol.com.
Vivienne M HazzardSanford Center for Bio-behavioral Research, Fargo, ND, USA. Electronic address: viviennehazzard@gmail.com.
Lauren M SchaeferSanford Center for Bio-behavioral Research, Fargo, ND, USA.
Rachel F RodgersAPPEAR, Department of Applied Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Allegra R GordonDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Tracy L TylkaDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jamie-Lee PennesiDepartment of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Lexie ConvertinoSan Diego State University/University of California San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA, USA.
Michael C ParentDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Tiffany A BrownDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Emilio J CompteSchool of Psychology, Adolfo Ibáñez University, Santiago, Chile; Research Department, Comenzar de Nuevo Treatment Center, Monterrey, Mexico.
Catherine P Cook-CottoneDepartment of Counseling, School, and Educational Psychology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Canice E CrerandDepartment of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Vanessa L MalcarneDepartment of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Jason M NagataDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Marisol PerezDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe AZ, USA.
Eva PilaSchool of Kinesiology, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
J Kevin ThompsonDepartment of Psychology, University of South Florida, FL, USA.
Stuart B MurrayDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
San Diego State University · USSanford Research · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USAdolfo Ibáñez University · CLArizona State University · USBoston University · USChapman University · USNortheastern University · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Southern California · USUniversity of South Florida · USWestern University · CA

Funding

The Neurocognitive Reward Learning Mechanisms of Binge EatingP20GM134969 · NIGMS · SANFORD RESEARCH NORTH · PI WONDERLICH, STEPHEN ARTHUR · 2021 to 2025
$11.5M
Regional Postdoctoral Training Grant in Eating Disorders ResearchT32MH082761 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CAROL B. PETERSON · 2009 to 2026
$6.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM134969NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH082761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectification theory and the tripartite influence model provide useful frameworks for understanding the body image experiences of men and women. However, there is little systematic investigation of how sexual orientation moderates the links between these constructs and body image satisfaction. It has been hypothesized, for example, that the associations of surveillance (i.e., monitoring of one's appearance due to objectification by others) would be strongest for groups targeted by the male gaze (e.g., gay men, lesbian women, and bisexual men and women). Here we proposed an integrated sociocultural model and examined these pathways in multigroup structural equation models in a national sample of heterosexual, bisexual, and lesbian women (ns = 5395; 598; 213, respectively), and heterosexual, bisexual, and gay men (4869; 194; and 194, respectively) aged 18-65 years. Sexual orientation moderated some of these pathways. The most consistent pattern was that appearance pressures were internalized to a greater extent among bisexual participants. The pathways to poorer body image were generally similar among heterosexual and gay/lesbian men and women. These findings highlight the importance of examining sexual orientation-specific influences on body image across diverse groups, as well as the commonalities in the experiences of men and women across sexual orientations.

Indexed as

Homosexuality, FemaleSexual and Gender MinoritiesBody ImageFemaleHeterosexualityHumansMaleSexual BehaviorBody imageMedia effectsObjectification theorySexual orientationTripartite influence model

Identifiers

PMID35272100
PMCPMC9812653
OpenAlexW4220968305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.