Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35271759›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2022

How to approach a neurogenetics diagnosis in different European countries: The European Academy of Neurology Neurogenetics Panel survey.

Michelangelo Mancuso, Henry Houlden, Maria Judit Molnar, Alessandro Filla, Marianthi Breza, Holm Graessner, Claudio L A Bassetti, Sylvia Boesch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michelangelo MancusoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Neurological Institute, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2738-8562
Henry HouldenDepartment of Neuromuscular Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
Maria Judit MolnarInstitute of Genomic Medicine and Rare Disorders, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Alessandro FillaDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Marianthi BrezaDepartment of Neuromuscular Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
Holm GraessnerInstitute for Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, Centre for Rare Diseases, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Claudio L A BassettiDepartment of Neurology, Inselspital, University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4535-0245
Sylvia BoeschDepartment of Neurology, Center for Rare Movement Disorders Innsbruck, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeSeven thousand rare diseases have been identified; most of them are of genetic origin. The diagnosis of a neurogenetic disease is difficult, and management and training programs are not well defined through Europe. To capture and assess care needs, the Neurogenetics Panel of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) has performed an explorative survey.

methodsThe survey covering multiple topics of neurogenetics was sent to all neurologists and neuropediatricians affiliated with the EAN practicing in Europe.

resultsWe collected answers from 239 members based in 40 European member states. Even though most of the responders were aware of neurogenetic diseases, when we came to amenability of carrying out a complete genetic diagnosis, almost one-third of the responders declared they were not happy with the current way of ordering genetic analyses in their countries. Furthermore, although single-gene analysis is diffusely present in Europe, whole exome and genome sequencing are not easily accessible, with considerable variabilities among countries. Almost 10% of the responders did not know if presymptomatic and prenatal diagnosis was available in their countries, and 47.3% were not aware of which newborn screening programs were available. Finally, 96.3% of responders declared that there is a need for education and training in neurogenetics.

conclusionsWe believe that this survey may be of importance for all European stakeholders in neurogenetics in identifying key priorities, targeting areas to encourage education/travel fellowships, and educational seminars in the future, because this area will only accelerate, and diagnostic requirements will expand.

Indexed as

NeurologyAcademies and InstitutesEuropeHumansInfant, NewbornNeurologistsSurveys and Questionnairesdisease diagnosisEuropeneurogeneticsrare diseasessurvey

Identifiers

PMID35271759
PMCPMC9314134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.