Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35271722›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2022

Phenotypic variation in photosynthetic traits in wheat grown under field versus glasshouse conditions.

Cristina R G Sales, Gemma Molero, John R Evans, Samuel H Taylor, Ryan Joynson, Robert T Furbank, Anthony Hall, Elizabete Carmo-Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Wheat NAC transcription factorPlant direct · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Feeding the world: impacts of elevated [COHorticulture research · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cristina R G SalesLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Library Avenue, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8748-7370
Gemma MoleroInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), Int. Apdo. Postal 6-641, 06600 Mexico, DF, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-6431-7563
John R EvansARC Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1379-3532
Samuel H TaylorLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Library Avenue, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9714-0656
Ryan JoynsonOrganisms and Ecosystems, Earlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7979-4725
Robert T FurbankARC Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8700-6613
Anthony HallOrganisms and Ecosystems, Earlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1806-020X
Elizabete Carmo-SilvaLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Library Avenue, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6059-9359

Funding

Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis CE140100015Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/ N020871/2Grains Research and Development Corporation ANU00025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recognition of the untapped potential of photosynthesis to improve crop yields has spurred research to identify targets for breeding. The CO2-fixing enzyme Rubisco is characterized by a number of inefficiencies, and frequently limits carbon assimilation at the top of the canopy, representing a clear target for wheat improvement. Two bread wheat lines with similar genetic backgrounds and contrasting in vivo maximum carboxylation activity of Rubisco per unit leaf nitrogen (Vc,max,25/Narea) determined using high-throughput phenotyping methods were selected for detailed study from a panel of 80 spring wheat lines. Detailed phenotyping of photosynthetic traits in the two lines using glasshouse-grown plants showed no difference in Vc,max,25/Narea determined directly via in vivo and in vitro methods. Detailed phenotyping of glasshouse-grown plants of the 80 wheat lines also showed no correlation between photosynthetic traits measured via high-throughput phenotyping of field-grown plants. Our findings suggest that the complex interplay between traits determining crop productivity and the dynamic environments experienced by field-grown plants needs to be considered in designing strategies for effective wheat crop yield improvement when breeding for particular environments.

Indexed as

Ribulose-Bisphosphate CarboxylaseTriticumBiological Variation, PopulationPhotosynthesisPlant BreedingRibulose-Bisphosphate CarboxylaseFieldglasshousehyperspectral reflectancephotosynthesisRubiscoTriticum aestivum

Identifiers

PMID35271722
PMCPMC9126738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.