Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35271706›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2022

Humoral Responses Against Variants of Concern by COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines in Immunocompromised Patients.

Michel Obeid, Madeleine Suffiotti, Celine Pellaton, Hasna Bouchaab, Anne Cairoli, Vanja Salvadé, Caroline Stevenel, Rosemary Hottinger, Catherine Pythoud, Lucie Coutechier and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Acute SARS-CoV-2 infection.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michel ObeidService of Immunology and Allergy, Departments of Medicine and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Madeleine SuffiottiService of Immunology and Allergy, Departments of Medicine and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Celine PellatonService of Immunology and Allergy, Departments of Medicine and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Hasna BouchaabService of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Anne CairoliService and Central Laboratory of Hematology, Departments of Oncology and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Vanja SalvadéService of Transplantation, Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Caroline StevenelService of Immunology and Allergy, Departments of Medicine and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Rosemary HottingerService of Immunology and Allergy, Departments of Medicine and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Catherine PythoudService of Immunology and Allergy, Departments of Medicine and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Lucie CoutechierService of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Laura MolinariService of Immunology and Allergy, Departments of Medicine and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Didier TronoLaboratory of Virology and Genetics, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Camillo RibiService of Immunology and Allergy, Departments of Medicine and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Raphael GottardoService of Data Science and Bioinformatics, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Craig FenwickService of Immunology and Allergy, Departments of Medicine and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Manuel PascualService of Transplantation, Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Michel A DuchosalService and Central Laboratory of Hematology, Departments of Oncology and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Solange PetersService of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Giuseppe PantaleoService of Immunology and Allergy, Departments of Medicine and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
University of Lausanne · CHÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: There are limited comparative data on the durability of neutralizing antibody (nAb) responses elicited by messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines against the SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) in immunocompromised patients and healthy controls. Objective: To assess the humoral responses after vaccination with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) or mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccines. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prospective, longitudinal monocentric comparative effectiveness study conducted at the Lausanne University Hospital, binding IgG anti-spike antibody and nAb levels were measured at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after vaccination with mRNA-1273 (24.6% of participants) or BNT162b2 (75.3% of participants). Interventions: All participants received 2 doses of either mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 vaccines 4 to 6 weeks apart. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome of the study was the persistence of nAb responses against the original, nonvariant SARS-CoV-2 (2019-nCoV) and different VOCs at 6 months after vaccination. Key secondary outcomes were associations of the type of mRNA vaccine, the underlying disease, and the treatment with the response to vaccination. Results: Among the 841 participants enrolled between January 14 and August 8, 2021, the patient population comprised 637 participants (mean [SD] age, 61.8 [13.7] years; 386 [60.6%] female), and the healthy control population comprised 204 participants (mean [SD] age, 45.9 [12.0] years; 144 [70.6%] female). There were 399 patients with solid cancers, 101 with hematologic cancers, 38 with solid organ transplants, 99 with autoimmune diseases, and 204 healthy controls. More than 15 000 nAb determinations were performed against the original, nonvariant 2019-nCoV and the Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta variants. The proportions of nAbs and their titers decreased in all study groups at 6 months after vaccination, with the greatest decreases for the Beta and Delta variants. For Beta, the proportion decreased to a median (SE) of 39.2% (5.5%) in those with hematologic cancers, 44.8% (2.7%) in those with solid cancers, 23.1% (8.3%) in those with solid organ transplants, and 22.7% (4.8%) in those with autoimmune diseases compared with 52.1% (4.2%) in healthy controls. For Delta, the proportions decreased to 41.8% (5.6%) in participants with hematologic cancer, 51.9% (2.7%) in those with solid cancers, 26.9% (8.7%) in those with solid organ transplants, and 30.7% (5.3%) in those with autoimmune diseases compared with 56.9% (4.1%) healthy controls. Neutralizing antibody titers decreased 3.5- to 5-fold between month 1 and month 6, and the estimated duration of response was greater and more durable among those participants vaccinated with mRNA-1273. In participants with solid cancers, the estimated duration of nAbs against the Beta variant was 221 days with mRNA-1273 and 146 days with BNT162b2, and against the Delta variant, it was 226 days with mRNA-1273 and 161 with BNT162b2. The estimated duration of nAbs in participants with hematologic cancers was 113 and 127 days against Beta and Delta variants, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: This comparative effectiveness study suggests that approximately half of patients with hematologic cancers and solid cancers, about 70% of patients with solid organ transplants or autoimmune diseases, and 40% of healthy controls have lost nAbs against the circulating VOCs at 6 months after vaccination. These findings may be helpful for developing the best boosting vaccination schedule especially in immunocompromised patients.

Indexed as

Autoimmune DiseasesCOVID-19Hematologic NeoplasmsNeoplasmsAgedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansImmunocompromised HostImmunoglobulin GMaleMiddle AgedmRNA VaccinesAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin GmRNA VaccinesRNA, MessengerVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID35271706
PMCPMC8914885
OpenAlexW4220885633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.