Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35271622›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Implementation of rapid and frequent SARS-CoV2 antigen testing and response in congregate homeless shelters.

Andrés Aranda-Díaz, Elizabeth Imbert, Sarah Strieff, Dave Graham-Squire, Jennifer L Evans, Jamie Moore, Willi McFarland, Jonathan Fuchs, Margaret A Handley, Margot Kushel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrés Aranda-DíazDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0566-4901
Elizabeth ImbertDivision of HIV, ID and Global Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Sarah StrieffSan Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Dave Graham-SquireUCSF Benioff Homelessness and Housing Initiative, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Jennifer L EvansUCSF Benioff Homelessness and Housing Initiative, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Jamie MooreSan Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Willi McFarlandSan Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Jonathan FuchsSan Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Margaret A HandleyUCSF Benioff Homelessness and Housing Initiative, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Margot KushelUCSF Benioff Homelessness and Housing Initiative, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1361-6889
University of California, San Francisco · USSan Francisco Department of Public Health · US

Funding

Ujima Mentoring ProgramP30MH062246 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MALLORY O JOHNSON · 2001 to 2026
$57.4M
Mentoring Researchers in Aging in Vulnerable PopulationsK24AG046372 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KUSHEL, MARGOT B · 2015 to 2025
$1.9M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople experiencing homelessness who live in congregate shelters are at high risk of SARS-CoV2 transmission and severe COVID-19. Current screening and response protocols using rRT-PCR in homeless shelters are expensive, require specialized staff and have delays in returning results and implementing responses.

methodsWe piloted a program to offer frequent, rapid antigen-based tests (BinaxNOW) to residents and staff of congregate-living shelters in San Francisco, California, from January 15th to February 19th, 2021. We used the Reach-Effectiveness-Adoption-Implementation-Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to evaluate the implementation.

resultsReach: We offered testing at ten of twelve eligible shelters. Shelter residents and staff had variable participation across shelters; approximately half of eligible individuals tested at least once; few tested consistently during the study. Effectiveness: 2.2% of participants tested positive. We identified three outbreaks, but none exceeded 5 cases. All BinaxNOW-positive participants were isolated or left the shelters. Adoption: We offered testing to all eligible participants within weeks of the project's initiation. Implementation: Adaptations made to increase reach and improve consistency were promptly implemented. Maintenance: San Francisco Department of Public Health expanded and maintained testing with minimal support after the end of the pilot.

conclusionRapid and frequent antigen testing for SARS-CoV2 in homeless shelters is a viable alternative to rRT-PCR testing that can lead to immediate isolation of infectious individuals. Using the RE-AIM framework, we evaluated and adapted interventions to enable the expansion and maintenance of protocols.

Indexed as

CaliforniaCOVID-19COVID-19 Serological TestingCOVID-19 TestingDisease OutbreaksHousingHumansIll-Housed PersonsImmunologic TestsMass ScreeningPilot ProjectsSan FranciscoSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35271622
PMCPMC8912252
OpenAlexW4220879749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.