Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35271612›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Comparison of disaster information from various media in strengthening ecological communication during & after natural disasters.

Fadhliah, Taqyuddin Bakri, Rahmat Hidayatullah, Muhammad Fardhal Pratama, Mohammad Alfit Laihi, Isrun, Muhammad Khairil, Muhammad Nur Ali, Muhammad Basir-Cyio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

FadhliahDepartment of Communication Science, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Tadulako University, Palu, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-5459-2994
Taqyuddin BakriDepartment of Languages and Arts Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Science, Tadulako University, Palu, Indonesia.
Rahmat HidayatullahDepartment of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Science, Tadulako University, Palu, Indonesia.
Muhammad Fardhal PratamaDepartment of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, Tadulako University, Palu, Indonesia.
Mohammad Alfit LaihiDepartment of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, Tadulako University, Palu, Indonesia.
IsrunDepartment of Agroecotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Tadulako University, Palu, Indonesia.
Muhammad KhairilDepartment of Communication Science, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Tadulako University, Palu, Indonesia.
Muhammad Nur AliDepartment of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Tadulako University, Palu, Indonesia.
Muhammad Basir-CyioDepartment of Agroecotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Tadulako University, Palu, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the relationship between the level of panic and the various media disaster information modalities available during and after a natural disaster event. The method used was a Mix Methods Research Approach, which is a combination of qualitative descriptive and quantitative exploratory approaches. There were 150 respondents for the three research locations at Palu City, Sigi Regency and Donggala Regency. Respondents were selected by considering the event conditions experienced, physical damage to their house and their educational background. Media sources of disaster information analyzed were TV, internet, mobile phone (WA/SMS), radio, mosque/church, surau, community leaders and word of mouth. The data used was Likert scale analyses for perception tested with Rank Spearman Correlation. The results showed that the most significant panic level (α<0.01) was when the internet was not working, cellphones could not be used, and radio broadcasts could not be received. The most effective sources of disaster information in promoting a resilience attitude were guidance and advice from community leaders and ecological communication that was built from word of mouth. The exposure to natural disasters was shown to unite peoples' hearts in friendship. despite some did not communicate with each other before the disaster, some were even hostile. As many as 78.6% of respondents admitted that the affection between them as victims actually appeared when natural disasters destroyed the joints of their lives, even amongst those who did not communicate with each other, or were even hostile, before the disaster. Out of ecological communication, a "strong hug due to natural disasters" was born.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneDisaster PlanningDisastersNatural DisastersCommunicationSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35271612
PMCPMC8912905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.