ArticlePloS one2022
Differences in the gut microbiome composition of Korean children and adult samples based on different DNA isolation kits.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Childhood obesity, dietary patterns and gut microbiota: a narrative review.Journal of physiology and biochemistry · 2026Review
- Article
- Bioinformatic strategies in metagenomics of chronic prostatitis.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Gut Dysbiosis: A New Avenue for Stroke Prevention and Therapeutics.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Gut Microbiota in Healthy Persons and Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Patients in North-Western Russia.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Fecal microbiota transplantation fromFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Growing old together: What we know about the influence of diet and exercise on the aging host's gut microbiome.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent studies have revealed that the composition of human gut microbiota varies according to region, race, age, diet, living environment, and sampling and DNA extraction method. The purpose of this study was to broaden our understanding of the intestinal microbial composition of Koreans by conducting a 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing on 78 Korean samples composed of adults, children, normal and obese groups. We compared the microbiome composition and diversity of these groups at different levels including the phylum and genus level using two different stool DNA extraction kits of QIAamp® PowerFecal® DNA Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and CT Max Fecal DNA Kit (Ct bio, Korea). We found that Ct bio (Ct) kit recovered higher DNA yields and OTUs than QIAamp® PowerFecal® DNA Kit (Qia). The Ct kit, which adopted more rigorous bead beating method, detected the most Gram-positive (G+) bacteria, Firmicutes, at the Phylum level, whereas the Qia kit, which used a less rigorous cell lysis method, found the most Gram-negative (G-) bacteria, Bacteroidetes. The Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio showed no significant difference between the obese and the normal groups of same kit; however, they were significantly different with two different kits. There was a difference in the intestinal flora between healthy Korean adults and children. The taxa that differed significantly between the adults and children were Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Prevotella, and Subdoligranulum. There was no significant difference in the intestinal flora between the normal weight group and the obese group in adults and children, respectively. This is probably because the difference in body mass index (BMI) between the sample groups collected in this study is statistically significant, but it is not large enough to show a clear difference in the flora. Therefore, these results should be interpreted with caution while considering the BMI values and Korean obesity criterion together.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.