Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35271583›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2022

Predicting treatment response and clinicopathological findings in lupus nephritis with urine epidermal growth factor, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 or their ratios.

Pintip Ngamjanyaporn, Suchin Worawichawong, Prapaporn Pisitkun, Khantong Khiewngam, Surasak Kantachuvesiri, Arkom Nongnuch, Montira Assanatham, Nuankanya Sathirapongsasuti, Chagriya Kitiyakara

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pintip NgamjanyapornFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Department of Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Suchin WorawichawongFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Department of Pathology, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-1238-1536
Prapaporn PisitkunFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Department of Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Khantong KhiewngamFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Department of Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Surasak KantachuvesiriFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Department of Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Arkom NongnuchFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Department of Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3876-9432
Montira AssanathamFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Department of Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-3835-175X
Nuankanya SathirapongsasutiFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Section of Translational Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chagriya KitiyakaraFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Department of Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6340-3534
Mahidol University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is a need for sensitive and specific biomarkers to predict kidney damage and therapeutic response in lupus nephritis (LN). Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) are cytokines with divergent roles. EGF or EGF/MCP1 ratio have been shown to correlate with prognosis in primary glomerulonephritis, but there is limited information in lupus nephritis (LN). This study evaluated the roles of MCP-1, EGF or their ratio as biomarkers of histopathology and response to treatment in LN.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional and observational study. Baseline urine MCP-1 and EGF levels in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and controls (total n = 101) were compared, and levels were correlated with clinicopathological findings and subsequent response to treatment.

resultsMCP-1 was higher in active LN (n = 69) compared to other SLE groups and controls, whereas EGF was not different. MCP-1 correlated with disease activity (proteinuria, renal SLEDAI, classes III/IV/V, and high activity index.) By contrast, EGF correlated with eGFR, but not with proteinuria, activity index, or class III/IV/V. MCP-1 was higher, and EGF was lower in high chronicity index. EGF/MCP-1 decreased with greater clinicopathological severity. In a subgroup with proliferative LN who completed six months of induction therapy (n = 41), EGF at baseline was lower in non-responders compared to responders, whereas MCP-1 was similar. By multivariable analysis, baseline EGF was independently associated with subsequent treatment response. Area under the curve for EGF to predict response was 0.80 (0.66-0.95). EGF ≥ 65.6 ng/ mgCr demonstrated 85% sensitivity and 71% specificity for response. EGF/MCP-1 did not improve the prediction for response compared to EGF alone.

conclusionMCP-1 increased with disease activity, whereas EGF decreased with low GFR and chronic damage. Urine EGF may be a promising biomarker to predict therapeutic response in LN. EGF/MCP-1 did not improve the prediction of response.

Indexed as

Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicLupus NephritisBiomarkersChemokine CCL2Cross-Sectional StudiesEpidermal Growth FactorFemaleHumansMaleProteinuriaBiomarkersChemokine CCL2Epidermal Growth Factor

Identifiers

PMID35271583
PMCPMC8912200
OpenAlexW4220696922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.