Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35271382›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2022

Diagnostic accuracy of a commercially available deep-learning algorithm in supine chest radiographs following trauma.

Jacob Gipson, Victor Tang, Jarrel Seah, Helen Kavnoudias, Adil Zia, Robin Lee, Biswadev Mitra, Warren Clements

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Deep learning for pneumothorax diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pneumothorax and Hemothorax: Practical Approaches for Radiologists.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jacob GipsonDepartment of Radiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0761-5975
Victor TangDepartment of Radiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jarrel SeahDepartment of Radiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Helen KavnoudiasDepartment of Radiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Adil ZiaDepartment of Radiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Robin LeeDepartment of Radiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Biswadev MitraNational Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Warren ClementsDepartment of Radiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTrauma chest radiographs may contain subtle and time-critical pathology. Artificial intelligence (AI) may aid in accurate reporting, timely identification and worklist prioritisation. However, few AI programs have been externally validated. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a commercially available deep convolutional neural network - Annalise CXR V1.2 (Annalise.ai) - for detection of traumatic injuries on supine chest radiographs.

methodsChest radiographs with a CT performed within 24 h in the setting of trauma were retrospectively identified at a level one adult trauma centre between January 2009 and June 2019. Annalise.ai assessment of the chest radiograph was compared to the radiologist report of the chest radiograph. Contemporaneous CT report was taken as the ground truth. Agreement with CT was measured using Cohen's κ and sensitivity/specificity for both AI and radiologists were calculated.

resultsThere were 1404 cases identified with a median age of 52 (IQR 33-69) years, 949 males. AI demonstrated superior performance compared to radiologists in identifying pneumothorax (

conclusionThe evaluated AI performed comparably to radiologists in interpreting chest radiographs. Further evaluation of this AI program has the potential to enable it to be safely incorporated in clinical processes. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Clinically useful AI programs represent promising decision support tools.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeep LearningAdultAgedAlgorithmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographyRadiography, ThoracicRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35271382
PMCPMC10996416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.