ArticleACS synthetic biology2022
Putative Phenotypically Neutral Genomic Insertion Points in Prokaryotes.
Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synthetic Biology of Plants and Microbes for Agriculture, Environment, and Future Applications.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- A CRISPR-SpCas9M-reporting system for efficient and rapid genome editing in Caulobacter crescentus.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- A toolbox to engineer the highly productive cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. PCC 11901.Plant physiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The barriers to effective genome editing in diverse prokaryotic organisms have been falling at an accelerated rate. As editing becomes easier in more organisms, quickly identifying genomic locations to insert new genetic functions without disrupting organism fitness becomes increasingly useful. When the insertion is noncoding DNA for applications such as information storage or barcoding, a neutral insertion point can be especially important. Here we describe an approach to identify putatively neutral insertion sites in prokaryotes. An algorithm (targetFinder) finds convergently transcribed genes with gap sizes within a specified range, and looks for annotations within the gaps. We report putative editing targets for 10 common synthetic biology chassis organisms, including coverage of available RNA-seq data, and provide software to apply to others. We further experimentally evaluate the neutrality of six identified targets in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.