ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Tree Trunk Recognition in Orchard Autonomous Operations under Different Light Conditions Using a Thermal Camera and Faster R-CNN.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Agriculture surrounding monitoring and object identification based on optimized you only look once and single shot multibox detector setups using combined vision and thermal images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Vision and 2D LiDAR Fusion-Based Navigation Line Extraction for Autonomous Agricultural Robots in Dense Pomegranate Orchards.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Complete Pipeline to Extract Temperature from Thermal Images of Pigs.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Sooty Mold Detection on Citrus Tree Canopy Using Deep Learning Algorithms.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Identification of Driver Status Hazard Level and the System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Navigation of an Autonomous Spraying Robot for Orchard Operations Using LiDAR for Tree Trunk Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Detection of Tip-Burn Stress on Lettuce Grown in an Indoor Environment Using Deep Learning Algorithms.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Pear Recognition in an Orchard from 3D Stereo Camera Datasets to Develop a Fruit Picking Mechanism Using Mask R-CNN.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Automatic Detection Method of Dairy Cow Feeding Behaviour Based on YOLO Improved Model and Edge Computing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In an orchard automation process, a current challenge is to recognize natural landmarks and tree trunks to localize intelligent robots. To overcome low-light conditions and global navigation satellite system (GNSS) signal interruptions under a dense canopy, a thermal camera may be used to recognize tree trunks using a deep learning system. Therefore, the objective of this study was to use a thermal camera to detect tree trunks at different times of the day under low-light conditions using deep learning to allow robots to navigate. Thermal images were collected from the dense canopies of two types of orchards (conventional and joint training systems) under high-light (12-2 PM), low-light (5-6 PM), and no-light (7-8 PM) conditions in August and September 2021 (summertime) in Japan. The detection accuracy for a tree trunk was confirmed by the thermal camera, which observed an average error of 0.16 m for 5 m, 0.24 m for 15 m, and 0.3 m for 20 m distances under high-, low-, and no-light conditions, respectively, in different orientations of the thermal camera. Thermal imagery datasets were augmented to train, validate, and test using the Faster R-CNN deep learning model to detect tree trunks. A total of 12,876 images were used to train the model, 2318 images were used to validate the training process, and 1288 images were used to test the model. The mAP of the model was 0.8529 for validation and 0.8378 for the testing process. The average object detection time was 83 ms for images and 90 ms for videos with the thermal camera set at 11 FPS. The model was compared with the YOLO v3 with same number of datasets and training conditions. In the comparisons, Faster R-CNN achieved a higher accuracy than YOLO v3 in tree truck detection using the thermal camera. Therefore, the results showed that Faster R-CNN can be used to recognize objects using thermal images to enable robot navigation in orchards under different lighting conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.