Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35271130›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Railway Track Inspection Using Deep Learning Based on Audio to Spectrogram Conversion: An on-the-Fly Approach.

Muhammad Shadab Alam Hashmi, Muhammad Ibrahim, Imran Sarwar Bajwa, Hafeez-Ur-Rehman Siddiqui, Furqan Rustam, Ernesto Lee, Imran Ashraf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Smartphone Sensors for Indoor Positioning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Muhammad Shadab Alam HashmiFaculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Khawaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-4631-3446
Muhammad IbrahimDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-5088-9571
Imran Sarwar BajwaDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-5161-6441
Hafeez-Ur-Rehman SiddiquiFaculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Khawaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-0671-2060
Furqan RustamFaculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Khawaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-8403-1047
Ernesto LeeDepartment of Computer Science, Broward College, Broward County, FL 33301, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1209-8565
Imran AshrafDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8271-6496

Funding

Florida Center for Advanced Analytics and Data Science funded by Ernesto.Net (under the Algorithms for Good Grant) N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The periodic inspection of railroad tracks is very important to find structural and geometrical problems that lead to railway accidents. Currently, in Pakistan, rail tracks are inspected by an acoustic-based manual system that requires a railway engineer as a domain expert to differentiate between different rail tracks' faults, which is cumbersome, laborious, and error-prone. This study proposes the use of traditional acoustic-based systems with deep learning models to increase performance and reduce train accidents. Two convolutional neural networks (CNN) models, convolutional 1D and convolutional 2D, and one recurrent neural network (RNN) model, a long short-term memory (LSTM) model, are used in this regard. Initially, three types of faults are considered, including superelevation, wheel burnt, and normal tracks. Contrary to traditional acoustic-based systems where the spectrogram dataset is generated before the model training, the proposed approach uses on-the-fly feature extraction by generating spectrograms as a deep learning model's layer. Different lengths of audio samples are used to analyze their performance with each model. Each audio sample of 17 s is split into 3 variations of 1.7, 3.4, and 8.5 s, and all 3 deep learning models are trained and tested against each split time. Various combinations of audio data augmentation are analyzed extensively to investigate models' performance. The results suggest that the LSTM with 8.5 split time gives the best results with the accuracy of 99.7%, the precision of 99.5%, recall of 99.5%, and F1 score of 99.5%.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAcousticsNeural Networks, Computeracoustic signalsdeep convolution neural networksLSTMmachine learningrailway track inspectionspectrograms

Identifiers

PMID35271130
PMCPMC8914836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.