Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35271066›Full record

Trial reportSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Hemiplegic Gait Detection Using an Inertial Sensor Located Freely in a Pocket.

Hangsik Shin

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hangsik ShinDepartment of Convergence Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3353-0310

Funding

Ministry of Health and Welfare HI21C0011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In most previous studies, the acceleration sensor is attached to a fixed position for gait analysis. However, if it is aimed at daily use, wearing it in a fixed position may cause discomfort. In addition, since an acceleration sensor can be built into the smartphones that people always carry, it is more efficient to use such a sensor rather than wear a separate acceleration sensor. We aimed to distinguish between hemiplegic and normal walking by using the inertial signal measured by means of an acceleration sensor and a gyroscope. We used a machine learning model based on a convolutional neural network to classify hemiplegic gaits and used the acceleration and angular velocity signals obtained from a system freely located in the pocket as inputs without any pre-processing. The classification model structure and hyperparameters were optimized using Bayesian optimization method. We evaluated the performance of the developed model through a clinical trial, which included a walking test of 42 subjects (57.8 ± 13.8 years old, 165.1 ± 9.3 cm tall, weighing 66.3 ± 12.3 kg) including 21 hemiplegic patients. The optimized convolutional neural network model has a convolutional layer, with number of fully connected nodes of 1033, batch size of 77, learning rate of 0.001, and dropout rate of 0.48. The developed model showed an accuracy of 0.78, a precision of 0.80, a recall of 0.80, an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80, and an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.84. We confirmed the possibility of distinguishing a hemiplegic gait by applying the convolutional neural network to the signal measured by a six-axis inertial sensor freely located in the pocket without additional pre-processing or feature extraction.

Indexed as

Gait Disorders, NeurologicWalkingAdultAgedBayes TheoremHumansMachine LearningMiddle AgedNeural Networks, Computeraccelerometryconvolutional neural networkgait analysisgyroscopehemiplegiainertial signal

Identifiers

PMID35271066
PMCPMC8914729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.