ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Compressed Deep Learning to Classify Arrhythmia in an Embedded Wearable Device.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning for Detecting Atrial Fibrillation from ECGs: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Wearable Technologies and AI at the Far Edge for Chronic Heart Failure Prevention and Management: A Systematic Review and Prospects.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Pooled it
- Deep Learning Applied to 12-Lead ECGs for Detection of Structural, Metabolic and Systemic Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- End-to-End Platform for Electrocardiogram Analysis and Model Fine-Tuning: Development and Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Efficient and Accurate Epilepsy Seizure Prediction and Detection Based on Multi-Teacher Knowledge Distillation RGF-Model.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Atrial Fibrillation Detection on the Embedded Edge: Energy-Efficient Inference on a Low-Power Microcontroller.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Conceptual Framework for User Trust in AI Biosensors: Integrating Cognition, Context, and Contrast.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Design and Implementation of an Atrial Fibrillation Detection Algorithm on the ARM Cortex-M4 Microcontroller.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Electrocardiogram Monitoring Wearable Devices and Artificial-Intelligence-Enabled Diagnostic Capabilities: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Wearable Devices Combined with Artificial Intelligence-A Future Technology for Atrial Fibrillation Detection?Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Feelings from the Heart Part II: Simulation and Validation of Static and Dynamic HRV Decrease-Trigger Algorithms to Detect Stress in Firefighters.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The importance of an embedded wearable device with automatic detection and alarming cannot be overstated, given that 15-30% of patients with atrial fibrillation are reported to be asymptomatic. These asymptomatic patients do not seek medical care, hence traditional diagnostic tools including Holter are not effective for the further prevention of associated stroke or heart failure. This is likely to be more so in the era of COVID-19, in which patients become more reluctant on hospitalization and checkups. However, little literature is available on this important topic. For this reason, this study developed efficient deep learning with model compression, which is designed to use ECG data and classify arrhythmia in an embedded wearable device. ECG-signal data came from Korea University Anam Hospital in Seoul, Korea, with 28,308 unique patients (15,412 normal and 12,896 arrhythmia). Resnets and Mobilenets with model compression (TensorFlow Lite) were applied and compared for the diagnosis of arrhythmia in an embedded wearable device. The weight size of the compressed model registered a remarkable decrease from 743 MB to 76 KB (1/10000), whereas its performance was almost the same as its original counterpart. Resnet and Mobilenet were similar in terms of accuracy, i.e., Resnet-50 Hz (97.3) vs. Mo-bilenet-50 Hz (97.2), Resnet-100 Hz (98.2) vs. Mobilenet-100 Hz (97.9). Here, 50 Hz/100 Hz denotes the down-sampling rate. However, Resnets took more flash memory and longer inference time than did Mobilenets. In conclusion, Mobilenet would be a more efficient model than Resnet to classify arrhythmia in an embedded wearable device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.