Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35270910›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

EEG Evoked Potentials to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Normal Volunteers: Inhibitory TMS EEG Evoked Potentials.

Jing Zhou, Adam Fogarty, Kristina Pfeifer, Jordan Seliger, Robert S Fisher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. EEG Signal Processing for Biomedical Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jing ZhouDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94304, USA.
Adam FogartyDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94304, USA.
Kristina PfeiferDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94304, USA.
Jordan SeligerDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94304, USA.
Robert S FisherDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94304, USA.
Stanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on cortex varies with stimulation parameters, so it would be useful to develop a biomarker to rapidly judge effects on cortical activity, including regions other than motor cortex. This study evaluated rTMS-evoked EEG potentials (TEP) after 1 Hz of motor cortex stimulation. New features are controls for baseline amplitude and comparison to control groups of sham stimulation. We delivered 200 test pulses at 0.20 Hz before and after 1500 treatment pulses at 1 Hz. Sequences comprised AAA = active stimulation with the same coil for test-treat-test phases (

Indexed as

Motor CortexTranscranial Magnetic StimulationBrainElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentialscerebral cortex stimulationelectromagnetic influenceepilepsyneurostimulationtranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID35270910
PMCPMC8915089
OpenAlexW4214672170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.