Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35270866›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Robots in Eldercare: How Does a Real-World Interaction with the Machine Influence the Perceptions of Older People?

Slawomir Tobis, Joanna Piasek, Miroslawa Cylkowska-Nowak, Aleksandra Suwalska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Determinants of Attitude to a Humanoid Social Robot in Care for Older Adults: A Post-Interaction Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Slawomir TobisDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-781 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0764-3258
Joanna PiasekInstitute of Robotics and Machine Intelligence, Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland.
Miroslawa Cylkowska-NowakDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-781 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0586-9250
Aleksandra SuwalskaDepartment of Mental Health, Chair of Psychiatry, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-572 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5759-5151

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Using autonomous social robots in selected areas of care for community-dwelling older adults is one of the promising approaches to address the problem of the widening care gap. We posed the question of whether a possibility to interact with the technology to be used had an impact on the scores given by the respondents in various domains of needs and requirements for social robots to be deployed in care for older individuals. (2) Methods: During the study, the opinions of older people (65+; n = 113; with no severe cognitive impairment) living in six social care institutions about a robot in care for older people were collected twice using the Users’ Needs, Requirements and Abilities Questionnaire (UNRAQ): after seeing a photo of the robot only and after a 90−150 min interaction with the TIAGo robot. (3) Results: Mean total scores for both assistive and social functions were higher after the interaction (p < 0.05). A positive correlation was found between opinion changes in social and assistive functions (r = 0.4842; p = 0.0000). (4) Conclusions: Preimplementation studies and assessments should include the possibility to interact with the robot to provide its future users with a clear idea of the technology and facilitate necessary customisations of the machine.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionRoboticsAgedHumansIndependent LivingSocial SupportSurveys and Questionnairesacceptancecareelderlyhuman-machine interactionsocial robot

Identifiers

PMID35270866
PMCPMC8915103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.