Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35270829›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Central Persons in Sustainable (Food) Consumption.

Carolin V Zorell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Guidance on risk-benefit assessment of foods.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024
    Article
  5. Public Awareness of Food Products, Preferences and Practices: Old Challenges and New Insights.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Carolin V ZorellSchool of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Örebro University, 701 82 Örebro, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7784-8996

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What people eat has become a highly political issue, closely intertwined with public health, environmental concerns, and climate change. Individuals' consumption decisions tend to be greatly influenced by the people that surround them, and this seems to be especially true when it comes to food. In recent years, alongside close contacts, such as family and friends, a myriad of social influencers have appeared on the screens, sharing opinions on what (not) to eat. Presenting results from a youth survey conducted in Sweden in 2019 (

Indexed as

FoodFood PreferencesAdolescentHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenchildren’s healthclimate-friendly eatingfood choicepolitical consumerismsocial influencesocial media

Identifiers

PMID35270829
PMCPMC8910505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.