Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35270807›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Developing Indicators to Measure Critical Health Literacy in the Context of Norwegian Lower Secondary Schools.

Anders L Hage Haugen, Kirsti Riiser, Marc Esser-Noethlichs, Ove Edvard Hatlevik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An Ongoing Teacher Professional Development Programme to Enhance Critical Health Literacy Pedagogies and Assessment.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Developing a Health Literacy Scale for adults in Hong Kong: A modified e-Delphi study with healthcare consumers and providers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Developing the HLSBMC health services research · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anders L Hage HaugenFaculty of International Studies and Teacher Education, Oslo Metropolitan University, 0130 Oslo, Norway.
Kirsti RiiserFaculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, 0130 Oslo, Norway.
Marc Esser-NoethlichsFaculty of International Studies and Teacher Education, Oslo Metropolitan University, 0130 Oslo, Norway.
Ove Edvard HatlevikFaculty of International Studies and Teacher Education, Oslo Metropolitan University, 0130 Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A critical health literacy (CHL) approach is recommended for promoting health in the school context. This construct is complex and includes three interconnected domains: (A) appraisal of critical information, (B) awareness of the social determinants of health (SDH), and (C) collective action to promote health and well-being. In recent literature reviews, no measurement instrument that covers all three domains of CHL in the school-context was found. Our aim was to develop self-reported measurement scales for each domain of CHL. The development process reported in this study was conducted in two stages. In the first stage, an initial item pool was generated based on literature reviews and focus group interviews (N = 15) with adolescents (steps 1-2). In the next steps, items were adjusted and removed based on the feedback from an expert panel and from representatives from the target group (steps 3-5). In stage two, we aimed to reduce the number of items and develop scales for each domain. We then piloted the current draft, which consists of 28 items (N = 114). A sub-sample (N = 10) of the participants were interviewed after they completed the survey to examine the instrument's face validity. Cronbach's α was used to assess the internal reliability of the scales; the reliability was promising for scales A (α = 0.83) and C (α = 0.85) but was below the recommended value for scale B (α = 0.61). The model fit indices were promising (TLI

Indexed as

Health LiteracyAdolescentHealth PromotionHumansPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSchoolsadolescentscritical health literacyhealth and life skillshealth educationhealth literacylower secondary schoolsschoolwell-being

Identifiers

PMID35270807
PMCPMC8910382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.