Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35270775›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Access to Healthcare and Social Protection among Migrant Workers in Thailand before and during COVID-19 Era: A Qualitative Study.

Watinee Kunpeuk, Sataporn Julchoo, Mathudara Phaiyarom, Pigunkaew Sinam, Nareerut Pudpong, Tharani Loganathan, Huso Yi, Rapeepong Suphanchaimat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Determinants of Self-Medication in Immigrants: A Systematic Review.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Health disparities among Burmese diaspora: an integrative review.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Watinee KunpeukInternational Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon Road, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Sataporn JulchooInternational Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon Road, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-5010-0606
Mathudara PhaiyaromInternational Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon Road, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-1156-1984
Pigunkaew SinamInternational Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon Road, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Nareerut PudpongInternational Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon Road, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Tharani LoganathanCentre for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-6690-000X
Huso YiSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore 117549, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-4724-5235
Rapeepong SuphanchaimatInternational Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon Road, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.

Funding

The Asia Pacific Observatory (APO) on Health Systems and Policies 2020/1002104-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thailand is a popular host nation for international migrant workers, particularly those from Cambodia, Lao PDR, and Myanmar. Thailand has introduced approaches to protect their rights for health and social welfare, using various mechanisms over many years. However, the implementation of these policies is dynamic and has been influenced by national security, economic necessity, and public health concerns. The aim of this study was to explore how Thailand designs and implements health and social welfare policies for migrants in Thailand, both before and during COVID-19. A qualitative analysis was used alongside interviews with 18 key informants in various sectors in this field. Thematic coding was applied. Results show that there were seven key themes emerging from the analysis, including: (i) sustainability of the HICS; (ii) people dropping out from the Social Security Scheme (SSS); (iii) quality of health screening in the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) migrants; (iv) health screening problems and state quarantine management in response to COVID-19; (v) managing the migration quota and dependency on migrant workers; (vi) influx of migrants in the backdrop of COVID-19; and (vii) poor living conditions of migrants and the impact of COVID-19. The majority of interviewees agreed that undocumented migrants is a critical concern that impedes access to migrants' health and social welfare. This situation was especially pronounced during the second wave of COVID-19 in Thailand, which took hold in migrant communities. In the short term, the poor living conditions of migrants urgently need to be addressed in order to contain and mitigate this crisis. In the long term, there needs to be an improved health system design that includes migrants, regardless of their immigration status. This requires intersectoral policy coherence, including the hastening of nationality verification to sustainably mitigate undocumented migrants.

Indexed as

COVID-19Transients and MigrantsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPublic PolicySARS-CoV-2ThailandCOVID-19health policymigrantsocial protection

Identifiers

PMID35270775
PMCPMC8910681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.