Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35270707›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Regarding Chemical Exposure among a Population Sample of Reproductive-Aged Women.

Isabel J Ricke, Ashley Oglesby, Grace R Lyden, Emily S Barrett, Stacey Moe, Ruby H N Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Exposure to Environmental Chemicals and Infertility Among US Reproductive-Aged Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Isabel J RickeDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5798-7198
Ashley OglesbyDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA.
Grace R LydenDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1408-851X
Emily S BarrettDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Stacey MoeDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA.
Ruby H N NguyenDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6598-8457

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES005022 · NIEHS · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI PANOS G. GEORGOPOULOS · 1988 to 2026
$47.4M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the knowledge and attitudes of reproductive-age women toward environmental chemicals and determined how these affect consumer behaviors. At the 2018 Minnesota State Fair, a large community sample of reproductive-age women was recruited to complete a survey on environmental health attitudes and behaviors. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression models were used to characterize current attitudes about chemicals. Multivariable logistic regression models examined how sociodemographic characteristics predict knowledge, attitudes, and consumer behaviors. A total of 871 women completed the survey; 74% strongly agreed that chemicals in the environment are dangerous, and 44% of women reported having heard of phthalates, while only 29% reported always practicing at least one environmentally healthy behavior (such as consuming food and beverages from safe plastics). Older age (35-39 versus 18-24: aOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3, 4.3; 40-44 versus 18-24; aOR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2, 3.2) and working in a healthcare profession (aOR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.2, 2.5) were associated with strong agreement that chemicals in the environmental are dangerous. Women who strongly agreed chemicals are dangerous were more likely to practice consumer behaviors to reduce their exposure. Interventions targeting knowledge and attitudes towards environmental chemicals could be an effective strategy for reducing harmful exposures.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultBeveragesEnvironmental HealthFemaleHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesBPAknowledgephthalatepre-conceptionwomen

Identifiers

PMID35270707
PMCPMC8910600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.