ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022
An Impact Asymmetry Analysis of Small Urban Green Space Attributes to Enhance Visitor Satisfaction.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigating Visual Aesthetic Fatigue in Urban Green Spaces.International journal of environmental research · 2023Article
- Effects of the spatial patterns of urban parks on public satisfaction: evidence from Shanghai, China.Landscape ecology · 2023Article
- What Drives Visitors' Use of Bins in Urban Parks? An Application of the Stimulus-Organism-Response Model.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urban green spaces have beneficial effects on the health and well-being of citizens. Understanding the factors influencing visitor satisfaction with urban green spaces contributes to making more informed policies. Prior studies on green spaces satisfaction primarily focused on the linear correlation between small urban green space attributes and satisfaction. In this manuscript, we presented a study aimed to (1) identify the attributes of SUGS as frustrators, dissatisfiers, hybrids, satisfiers, and delighters; (2) prioritize attributes for effective satisfaction management; (3) assist managers in drafting guidelines for operational management decisions. We gathered a range of information about the users to nine SUGS in Shanghai, in 2020, via a questionnaire, and we found that safety, noise, and social interaction are improvement priorities. Squares and visitors' behavior should not be ignored in SUGS management. Moreover, managers should carefully monitor SUGS attributes of the social environment to meet users' expectations. The findings of this study have implications for SUGS management and future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.