Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35270574›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Building a Health Literacy Indicator from Angola Demographic and Health Survey in 2015/2016.

Neida Neto Vicente Ramos, Inês Fronteira, Maria Rosário Oliveira Martins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comprehensive Knowledge of HIV and AIDS and Related Factors in Angolans Aged between 15 and 49 Years.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Neida Neto Vicente RamosGlobal Health and Tropical Medicine, Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Nova University of Lisbon, 1249-008, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2042-309X
Inês FronteiraGlobal Health and Tropical Medicine, Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Nova University of Lisbon, 1249-008, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1406-4585
Maria Rosário Oliveira MartinsGlobal Health and Tropical Medicine, Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Nova University of Lisbon, 1249-008, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7941-0285

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health literacy is a determinant factor for population health. It is important both for the prevention of health problems and the better management of those problems and unexpected situations that happen. Low health literacy has been consistently associated with poor health outcomes. This study aimed to develop a health literacy indicator for Angola and to analyze pertinent demographic characteristics related to it. Data were obtained from the first Angola Demographic and Health Survey conducted in 2015/16; we included 10 questions related to the American National Academy of Medicine definition of health literacy. Using factor analysis, we extracted one i indicator corresponding to four dimensions of health literacy. The indicator was dichotomized, and we used Logistic Regression to estimate factors associated with health literacy level: we obtained data from 19,785 adolescents and adults, aged 15-49 years. The internal consistency of the i indicator was reliable (Cronbach's

Indexed as

Health LiteracyAdolescentAdultAngolaFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesAngolaassessment toolhealth literacyinequalities

Identifiers

PMID35270574
PMCPMC8910521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.