Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35270533›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Cross-Country Student Perceptions about Online Medical Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Tomoya Suzuki, Anju Murayama, Yasuhiro Kotera, Divya Bhandari, Yuki Senoo, Yuta Tani, Kayo Harada, Ayumu Kawamoto, Satomi Sato, Toyoaki Sawano and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Tomoya SuzukiMedical Governance Research Institute, Takanawa, Minato-ku, Tokyo 1087505, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6331-1813
Anju MurayamaMedical Governance Research Institute, Takanawa, Minato-ku, Tokyo 1087505, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4279-4748
Yasuhiro KoteraSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2HA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0251-0085
Divya BhandariMedical Governance Research Institute, Takanawa, Minato-ku, Tokyo 1087505, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7720-9150
Yuki SenooMedical Governance Research Institute, Takanawa, Minato-ku, Tokyo 1087505, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7289-5016
Yuta TaniMedical Governance Research Institute, Takanawa, Minato-ku, Tokyo 1087505, Japan.
Kayo HaradaMedical Governance Research Institute, Takanawa, Minato-ku, Tokyo 1087505, Japan.
Ayumu KawamotoMedical Governance Research Institute, Takanawa, Minato-ku, Tokyo 1087505, Japan.
Satomi SatoMedical Governance Research Institute, Takanawa, Minato-ku, Tokyo 1087505, Japan.
Toyoaki SawanoDepartment of Surgery, Jyoban Hospital of Tokiwa Foundation, Iwaki 9728322, Japan.
Yasushi MiyataDepartment of Primary Care and Community Health, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute 4801195, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6868-4929
Masaharu TsubokuraMedical Governance Research Institute, Takanawa, Minato-ku, Tokyo 1087505, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8027-202X
Tetsuya TanimotoMedical Governance Research Institute, Takanawa, Minato-ku, Tokyo 1087505, Japan.
Akihiko OzakiMedical Governance Research Institute, Takanawa, Minato-ku, Tokyo 1087505, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4415-9657

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Introduction: Most educational institutions around the world have shifted from traditional face-to-face to online education amid COVID-19. This change may particularly impact medical students, whose education is heavily influenced by clinical learning experiences. Accordingly, we investigated medical students' perceptions about positive and negative aspects of online medical education in Japan and overseas during the COVID-19 pandemic. (2) Methods: In-depth online interviews were conducted among 13 Japanese medical students and five medical students from Slovakia, Norway, and Hungary. Interviews were conducted from 23rd September to 3rd October 2020 using the snowball sampling method. Questions were focused on five main areas: Q1 the type of online education; Q2 advantages and disadvantages of online education; Q3 any changes in the relationship with teachers, friends, and family; Q4 any opinions about further improvements in online education; and Q5 any needs for affiliation with a particular university. Then thematic analysis was conducted. (3) Results: The results of the thematic analysis revealed the following four themes that represent the positive and negative aspects of online medical education; Theme 1: Timesaving and Flexibility; Theme 2: Technical problems and lack of digital skills; Theme 3: Unstandardized teaching skills; Theme 4: Lack of experience beyond medical school lectures. (4) Conclusions: While online education was found useful in terms of saving time and creating a flexible learning environment, many important drawbacks were noted such as internet and computer problems and unstandardized teaching skills, and lack of quality assurance. In addition, experiences outside the classroom such as making relationships with faculty and friends, conducting research and participating in extracurricular activities were missed, which they normally enjoy in college life.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, DistanceEducation, MedicalStudents, MedicalHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19distance-learningmedical educationpandemicSARS-CoV-2undergraduate

Identifiers

PMID35270533
PMCPMC8910235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.