Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35270471›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

A Pilot Study on the Feasibility of Developing and Implementing a Mobile App for the Acquisition of Clinical Knowledge and Competencies by Medical Students Transitioning from Preclinical to Clinical Years.

Alvaro Prados-Carmona, Francisco Fuentes-Jimenez, Rafael Roman de Los Reyes, Antonio García-Rios, Jesus Rioja-Bravo, Ezequiel Herruzo-Gomez, Pablo Perez-Martinez, Jose Lopez-Miranda, Javier Delgado-Lista

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alvaro Prados-CarmonaDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, 18016 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6799-3727
Francisco Fuentes-JimenezMaimonides Institute for Biomedical Research Córdoba, 14004 Cordoba, Spain.
Rafael Roman de Los ReyesAdvanced Computer Architecture Group, Department of Computer Architecture, Electronics and Electronic Technology, Universidad de Cordoba, 14071 Cordoba, Spain.
Antonio García-RiosMaimonides Institute for Biomedical Research Córdoba, 14004 Cordoba, Spain.
Jesus Rioja-BravoAdvanced Computer Architecture Group, Department of Computer Architecture, Electronics and Electronic Technology, Universidad de Cordoba, 14071 Cordoba, Spain.
Ezequiel Herruzo-GomezDepartment of Computer Architecture, Electronics and Electronic Technology and Grupo Docente 30, Universidad de Cordoba, 14071 Cordoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3279-3802
Pablo Perez-MartinezMaimonides Institute for Biomedical Research Córdoba, 14004 Cordoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3264-2767
Jose Lopez-MirandaMaimonides Institute for Biomedical Research Córdoba, 14004 Cordoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8844-0718
Javier Delgado-ListaMaimonides Institute for Biomedical Research Córdoba, 14004 Cordoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2982-2716

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the consequent restrictions, universities have had to adapt their curricula substantially to new schemes in which remote learning is of the essence. In this study, we assess the feasibility of developing a mobile app supplementary to the distant teaching paradigm for the “Cardiology” module of the “General Pathology” subject in undergraduate Medical Education, and we evaluate its impact and acceptability. A cohort of volunteer second-year medical students (n = 44) had access to the app, and their opinions on its utility (1−10) were collected. Additionally, the students were invited to refer their expected satisfaction (1−10) with a blended learning methodology overlapping this new tool with the traditional resources. The average expected satisfaction had been compared to the average satisfaction obtained by just the traditional methodology in other modules from the same subject. Through a qualitative approach, we defined the strengths and weaknesses of the tool. Seventy-seven percent of the participants rated at 8/10 or more the potential learning value of the application and, if used as a supplement to traditional teaching, it would also statistically improve the satisfaction of students (6.52 vs. 8.70, p < 0.001). Similarly, the qualitative data corroborated the benefits of such innovation. Multidisciplinary collaborations are encouraged to develop teaching innovations, although further research should aim to better define the effectiveness of learning with these resources.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mobile ApplicationsStudents, MedicalFeasibility StudiesHumansPandemicsPilot ProjectsSARS-CoV-2cardiologyclinical competenceeducational modelsmedical educationsatisfactionsmartphone

Identifiers

PMID35270471
PMCPMC8910514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.