Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35270460›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Credibility and Involvement of Social Media in Education-Recommendations for Mitigating the Negative Effects of the Pandemic among High School Students.

Hedviga Tkacová, Roman Králik, Miroslav Tvrdoň, Zita Jenisová, José García Martin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Antecedents of the Technology Acceptance Model in Microentrepreneurs' Intention to Use Social Networking Sites.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023
    Article
  5. Psychophysiological Stress Status of Soldiers Prior to an Operative Deployment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Hedviga TkacováDepartment of Journalism, Faculty of Arts and Letters, The Catholic University in Ruzomberok, 034 01 Ruzomberok, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0003-3062-2284
Roman KrálikDepartment of Russian Language, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 117198 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1929-1894
Miroslav TvrdoňDepartment of Social Work and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences and Health Care, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, 949 74 Nitra, Slovakia.
Zita JenisováDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Informatics, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, 949 74 Nitra, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0001-8720-4337
José García MartinDepartment of Sociology, Faculty of Political Science and Sociology, University of Granada, 18001 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7401-0613
Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra · SKCatholic University in Ruzomberok · SKPeoples' Friendship University of Russia · RUUniversidad de Granada · ES

Funding

Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic 029UKF-4/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of considerations on the potential attenuation of the negative consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic with the use of credible social media in online education during a pandemic, the subject of our own research was the fulfillment of two goals. The main research goals were to identify, categorize, and evaluate the possibilities of using social media in online education during the pandemic from the perspective of selected teachers and students from secondary schools in Slovakia. The research methods of the first phase (qualitative) of the research involved brainstorming among nine secondary school teachers. The second research phase (quantitative) used a questionnaire, which was completed by 102 high school students from all over Slovakia. The collection of both quantitative and qualitative data was used in this research. The research results revealed the most representative opinions of teachers on the current and real possibilities of engaging credible social media in online education and the views of high school students on their desired use and involvement of social media in online education. The intersection of the two findings presents a picture of the possibilities of using credible social media in online education, which can help maintain students' interest in online education during a pandemic. Based on these findings, it can be stated that the opinions identified in the research group of teachers correspond to a large extent with the desired use of social media in education from the perspective of students. In addition, however, students would welcome more opportunities to use and engage social media in today's online education. The result of this research is an analysis of social media patterns applied to online education, which are of greater interest to students and could act as elements for reducing the negative consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, i.e., six forms of online education and 24 educational activities that could contribute, inter alia, to mitigating the different negative effects of the pandemic among youth generation. The findings also benefit from the presentation of many specific options and recommendations for the use of social media in online education during a pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Social MediaAdolescentHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Studentscredibilitynegative effects of the pandemiconline educationsocial mediayoung generation

Identifiers

PMID35270460
PMCPMC8910481
OpenAlexW4214548551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.