Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35270442›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Peer Worker-Supported Transition from Hospital to Home-Outcomes for Service Users.

Nicola Hancock, Bridget Berry, Michelle Banfield, Georgia Pike-Rowney, Justin Newton Scanlan, Sarah Norris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Peer support in acute psychiatric inpatient settings: A scoping review.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Lived Experience Participation in Suicide Prevention Activities in Australia, a Scoping Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicola HancockFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6877-9239
Bridget BerryFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown 2006, Australia.
Michelle BanfieldCollege of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra 0200, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3024-1687
Georgia Pike-RowneyCollege of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra 0200, Australia.
Justin Newton ScanlanFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5639-6476
Sarah NorrisFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4733-6906

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransitioning from psychiatric hospitalisation back to community presents a period of heightened suicide, homelessness, relapse, and rehospitalisation risk. The Australian state of New South Wales established a state-wide Peer Supported Transfer of Care (Peer-STOC) initiative to enhance recovery-focused supports available during this transition period.

aimsTo understand the impacts and outcomes of the Peer-STOC program on service users from three stakeholder perspectives: service users themselves, peer worker service providers, and other mental health workers and clinicians interfacing with the program.

methodsQualitative data from 82 questionnaires and 58 individual in-depth interviews were analysed thematically using constant comparative methods and an iterative and inductive process.

resultsAll stakeholders described positive impacts and outcomes of the program for service users. These included: (a) a better, less traumatic inpatient experience; (b) felt understood, cared about and less alone; (c) easier to leave hospital; (d) easier to get back into life and daily routines; (e) built and re-established community connections; (f) gained new knowledge, strategies, and skills; and (g) felt more hopeful about my recovery.

conclusionsThe Peer-STOC program had a positive impact. It enhanced people's experience in hospital, eased their transition from hospital and assisted with people recovering community-based relationships, activities, and routines.

Indexed as

Hospital to Home TransitionMental DisordersAustraliaHospitalsHumansPeer Groupco-productiondischargehospital avoidancelived experience researchpeer supportrecovery

Identifiers

PMID35270442
PMCPMC8910236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.