Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35270388›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Association between Noise Annoyance and Mental Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Xiangpu Gong, Benjamin Fenech, Claire Blackmore, Yingxin Chen, Georgia Rodgers, John Gulliver, Anna L Hansell

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. City-wide space-time patterns of environmental noise pollution in Kigali, Rwanda.Environmental research letters : ERL [Web site] · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Physical working conditions over time: a repeated cross-sectional study in German employees.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiangpu GongCentre for Environmental Health and Sustainability, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7HA, UK.
Benjamin FenechNoise and Public Health Group, Environmental Hazards and Emergencies Department, UK Health Security Agency, Birmingham B2 4BH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6059-8719
Claire BlackmoreCentre for Environmental Health and Sustainability, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7HA, UK.
Yingxin ChenCentre for Environmental Health and Sustainability, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7HA, UK.
Georgia RodgersNoise and Public Health Group, Environmental Hazards and Emergencies Department, UK Health Security Agency, Birmingham B2 4BH, UK.
John GulliverCentre for Environmental Health and Sustainability, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7HA, UK.
Anna L HansellCentre for Environmental Health and Sustainability, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7HA, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, most studies of noise and mental health have focused on noise exposure rather than noise annoyance. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate whether the available evidence supports an adverse association between noise annoyance and mental health problems in people. We carried out a literature search of Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, and conference proceedings published between 2000 and 2022. Thirteen papers met the inclusion criteria. We conducted meta-analyses of noise annoyance in relation to depression, anxiety, and general mental health. In the meta-analyses, we found that depression was approximately 1.23 times greater in those who were highly noise-annoyed (N = 8 studies). We found an approximately 55% higher risk of anxiety (N = 6) in highly noise-annoyed people. For general mental health (N = 5), highly annoyed participants had an almost 119% increased risk of mental health problems as assessed by Short Form (SF) or General Household Questionnaires (GHQ), but with high heterogeneity and risk of publication bias. In conclusion, findings are suggestive of a potential link between noise annoyance and poorer mental health based on a small number of studies. More evidence is needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

Mental HealthNoise, TransportationAnxietyAnxiety DisordersEnvironmental ExposureHumansanxiety disorderdepressionenvironmental and neighborhood noisegeneral mental healthmental healthnoise annoyancetraffic noise

Identifiers

PMID35270388
PMCPMC8910193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.