Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35270317›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Higher Work-Privacy Conflict and Lower Job Satisfaction in GP Leaders and Practice Assistants Working Full-Time Compared to Part-Time: Results of the IMPROVE

Julian Göbel, Manuela Schmidt, Tanja Seifried-Dübon, Karen Linden, Lukas Degen, Esther Rind, Anna-Lisa Eilerts, Claudia Pieper, Matthias Grot, Brigitte Werners and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Julian GöbelInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Germany Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Manuela SchmidtInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Germany Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Tanja Seifried-DübonDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Osianderstraße 5, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5935-539X
Karen LindenInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Germany Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Lukas DegenInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Germany Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Esther RindInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tuebingen, Wilhelmstr. 27, 72074 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8200-4862
Anna-Lisa EilertsInstitute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Claudia PieperInstitute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5986-9788
Matthias GrotInstitute of Management, Operations Research, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstr. 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany.
Brigitte WernersInstitute of Management, Operations Research, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstr. 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany.
Verena SchröderCenter for Clinical Trials, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Karl-Heinz JöckelCenter for Clinical Trials, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Monika A RiegerInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tuebingen, Wilhelmstr. 27, 72074 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7855-3663
Birgitta M WeltermannInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Germany Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1285-1545
On Behalf Of The IMPROVEjob Consortium
University of Bonn · DEEssen University Hospital · DEInstitut für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie · DERuhr University Bochum · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Work-privacy conflict (WPC) has become an important issue for medical professionals. The cluster-randomized controlled IMPROVEjob study aimed at improving job satisfaction (primary outcome), with additional outcomes such as examining the work-privacy conflict in German general practice personnel. Using baseline data of this study, the relationship between work-privacy conflict and job satisfaction (JS) was analyzed. In addition, factors associated with higher WPC were identified. Methods: At baseline, 366 participants (general practitioners (GPs) in leadership positions, employed general practitioners, and practice assistants) from 60 German practices completed a questionnaire addressing socio-demographic data and job characteristics. Standardized scales from the German version of the COPSOQ III requested data concerning job satisfaction and work-privacy conflict. Both scores range from 0 (lowest) to 100 (highest). Multilevel analysis accounted for the clustered data. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS and RStudio software, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. Results: Job satisfaction was 77.16 (mean value; SD = 14.30) among GPs in leadership positions (n = 84), 79.61 (SD = 12.85) in employed GPs (n = 28), and 72.58 (SD = 14.42) in practice assistants (n = 254). Mean values for the WPC-scale were higher for professionals with more responsibilities: GPs in leadership positions scored highest with 64.03 (SD = 29.96), followed by employed physicians (M = 45.54, SD =30.28), and practice assistants (M = 32.67, SD = 27.41). General practitioners and practice assistants working full-time reported significantly higher work-privacy conflict than those working part-time (p < 0.05). In a multilevel analysis, work-privacy conflict was significantly associated with job satisfaction (p < 0.001). A multiple regression analysis identified working hours, as well as and being a practice owner or an employed physician as factors significantly influencing WPC. Discussion: WPC was high among general practice leaders and practice personnel working full-time. Future interventions to support practice personnel should focus on reducing WPC, as there is good evidence of its effects on job satisfaction.

Indexed as

General PracticeGeneral PractitionersEmploymentHumansJob SatisfactionPrivacySurveys and Questionnairesgeneral practice leadergeneral practitionerjob satisfactionpractice assistantprimary careworking conditionswork-privacy conflict

Identifiers

PMID35270317
PMCPMC8910119
OpenAlexW4213427292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.