Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35270306›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Policy and Behavior: Comparisons between Twitter Discussions about the US Tobacco 21 Law and Other Age-Related Behaviors.

Page D Dobbs, Jason B Colditz, Shelby Shields, Anna Meadows, Brian A Primack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Page D DobbsHealth, Human Performance and Recreation Department, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1913-6488
Jason B ColditzCenter for Research on Media, Technology and Health, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Shelby ShieldsHealth, Human Performance and Recreation Department, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Anna MeadowsHealth, Human Performance and Recreation Department, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Brian A PrimackCollege of Education and Health Professions, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.

Funding

Leveraging Twitter to monitor nicotine and tobacco-related cancer communicationR01CA225773 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PRIMACK, BRIAN A. · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA225773NCI NIH HHS R01CA225773
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To combat the e-cigarette epidemic among young audiences, a federal law was passed in the US that raised the minimum legal sales age of tobacco to 21 years (commonly known as Tobacco 21). Little is known about sentiment toward this law. Thus, the purpose of our study was to systematically explore trends about Tobacco 21 discussions and comparisons to other age-restriction behaviors on Twitter. Twitter data (n = 4628) were collected from September to December of 2019 that were related to Tobacco 21. A random subsample of identified tweets was used to develop a codebook. Two trained coders independently coded all data, with strong inter-rater reliability (κ = 0.71 to 0.93) found for all content categories. Associations between sentiment and content categories were calculated using χ2 analyses. Among relevant tweets (n = 955), the most common theme—the disjunction between ages for military enlistment and tobacco use—was found in 17.8% of all tweets. Anti-policy sentiment was strongly associated with the age of military enlistment, alcohol, voting, and adulthood (p < 0.001 for all). Opposition to Tobacco 21 propagates on social media because the US federal law does not exempt military members. However, the e-cigarette epidemic may have fueled some support for this law.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSocial MediaAdultHumansPolicyReproducibility of ResultsTobacco Productsage-restrictionhealth communicationsentimentTobacco 21tobacco use

Identifiers

PMID35270306
PMCPMC8910197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.