Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35270141›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Genetic Analysis for Resistance to Sclerotinia Stem Rot, Yield and Its Component Traits in Indian Mustard [

Manjeet Singh, Ram Avtar, Neeraj Kumar, Rakesh Punia, Ajay Pal, Nita Lakra, Nisha Kumari, Dalip Kumar, Anu Naruka, Mahavir Bishnoi and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manjeet SinghDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7425-7656
Ram AvtarDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7380-5382
Neeraj KumarDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India.
Rakesh PuniaDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India.
Ajay PalDepartment of Biochemistry, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8794-3225
Nita LakraDepartment of Molecular Biology, Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6043-579X
Nisha KumariDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2034-3580
Dalip KumarDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India.
Anu NarukaDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India.
Mahavir BishnoiDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7290-5229
Rajbir Singh KhedwalDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5652-4266
Raju Ram ChoudharyDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India.
Anoop SinghDepartment of Botany, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak 124001, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0310-895X
Ravindra Kumar MeenaDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4997-9710
Ankit DhillonDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India.
Vivek K SinghDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0443-6947
Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University · INMaharshi Dayanand University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the mode of gene action that controls seed yield and Sclerotinia stem rot resistance in Indian mustard is critical for boosting yield potential. In a line × tester mating design, ten susceptible lines and four resistant testers were used to conduct genetic analysis. The significance of general combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) variances revealed that both additive and non-additive gene actions were involved in the inheritance of Sclerotinia stem rot resistance and yield attributing traits. In addition to 1000-seed weight and number of primary and secondary branches/plant, the genotypes RH 1569 (line) and DRMR 2035 (tester) appeared to be the strongest general combiners for Sclerotinia stem rot resistance. RH 1657 × EC 597317 was the only cross among several that demonstrated a significant desired SCA value for Sclerotinia rot resistance. Regarding SCA effects for yield and component traits, the cross RH 1658 × EC 597328 performed best, with a non-significant but acceptable negative SCA effect for resistance. DRMR 2035, RH 1222-28, RH 1569, RH 1599-41, RH 1657, RH 1658, and EC 597328 are promising genotypes to use as parents in future heterosis breeding and for obtaining populations with high yield potential and greater resistance to Sclerotinia stem rot disease in Indian mustard, based on GCA effects of parents,

Indexed as

combining abilitygene actionheterosis breedingSclerotinia stem rotselection criteria

Identifiers

PMID35270141
PMCPMC8912491
OpenAlexW4214683225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.