Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35270133›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Mechanical Forces in Floral Development.

Kester Bull-Hereñu, Patricia Dos Santos, João Felipe Ginefra Toni, Juliana Hanna Leite El Ottra, Pakkapol Thaowetsuwan, Julius Jeiter, Louis Philippe Ronse De Craene, Akitoshi Iwamoto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Reproductive development of common buckwheat (Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kester Bull-HereñuFundación Flores, Ministro Carvajal 30, Santiago 7500801, Chile.
Patricia Dos SantosCentre for Ecology Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c), Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, Edifício C2, Piso 5, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal.
João Felipe Ginefra ToniFaculty of Biological Sciences, Friederich Schiller University of Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany.
Juliana Hanna Leite El OttraDepartment of Botany, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-090, Brazil.
Pakkapol ThaowetsuwanDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Sanam Chandra Palace Campus, Silpakorn University, Nakhorn Pathom 73000, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-8252-9546
Julius JeiterNees-Institute for Biodiversity of Plants, University of Bonn, Meckenheimer Allee 170, 53115 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5384-5064
Louis Philippe Ronse De CraeneRoyal Botanic Gardens Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8333-4596
Akitoshi IwamotoDepartment of Biological sciences, Faculty of Science, Kanagawa University, Hiratsuka 259-1293, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6492-4956

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft INST 217/849-1 FUGGFondecyt(CONICYT/ANID) 11150847Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology JP19H05358Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology JP21H00375São Paulo Research Foundation #15/09776-7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical forces acting within the plant body that can mold flower shape throughout development received little attention. The palette of action of these forces ranges from mechanical pressures on organ primordia at the microscopic level up to the twisting of a peduncle that promotes resupination of a flower at the macroscopic level. Here, we argue that without these forces acting during the ontogenetic process, the actual flower phenotype would not be achieved as it is. In this review, we concentrate on mechanical forces that occur at the microscopic level and determine the fate of the flower shape by the physical constraints on meristems at an early stage of development. We thus highlight the generative role of mechanical forces over the floral phenotype and underline our general view of flower development as the sum of interactions of known physiological and genetic processes, together with physical aspects and mechanical events that are entangled towards the shaping of the mature flower.

Indexed as

floral developmentflower shapegrowth forcesmechanical forcesorgan imprintpressure

Identifiers

PMID35270133
PMCPMC8912604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.