Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35270022›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Chromosome Segregation in the Oocyte: What Goes Wrong during Aging.

Marta Wasielak-Politowska, Paweł Kordowitzki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marta Wasielak-PolitowskaCenter of Gynecology, Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine-Artemida, Jagiellonska Street 78, 10-357 Olsztyn, Poland.
Paweł KordowitzkiInstitute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of Polish Academy of Sciences, Tumiwa Street 10, 10-243 Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3344-5060

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human female fertility and reproductive lifespan decrease significantly with age, resulting in an extended post-reproductive period. The central dogma in human female reproduction contains two important aspects. One is the pool of oocytes in the human ovary (the ovarian reserve; approximately 10

Indexed as

Chromosome SegregationMeiosisAgingAneuploidyFemaleHumansOocytesPregnancySpindle Apparatusaneuploidychromosome segregationeuploidymaternal agingoocytesspindle assemblyspindle formation

Identifiers

PMID35270022
PMCPMC8911062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.