ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
Comparison between Janus-Base Nanotubes and Carbon Nanotubes: A Review on Synthesis, Physicochemical Properties, and Applications.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioprintable Janus Base Nano-Matrix for Improved Cartilage Tissue Engineering.Regenerative engineering and translational medicine · 2026Article
- Nanostructured implants for enhanced integration and localized therapy.BioImpacts : BI · 2026Review
- Injectable BMSC-Based Extracellular Matrix-Mimicking Microtissue for Myocardial Infarction Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Computation-aided design of rod-shaped nanoparticles for tumoral targeting.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025Article
- In space fabrication of Janus base nano matrix for improved assembly and bioactivity.NPJ microgravity · 2025Article
- Challenges and advances of the stability of mRNA delivery therapeutics.Nucleic acid insights · 2024Article
- Translational biomaterials of four-dimensional bioprinting for tissue regeneration.Biofabrication · 2023Review
- Biosensor integrated tissue chips and their applications on Earth and in space.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2023Review
- Nanomedicine strategies for central nervous system (CNS) diseases.Frontiers in biomaterials science · 2023Article
- Blood-brain-barrier modeling with tissue chips for research applications in space and on Earth.Frontiers in space technologies · 2023Article
- Design of double functionalized carbon nanotube for amphotericin B and genetic material delivery.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research interest in nanoscale biomaterials has continued to grow in the past few decades, driving the need to form families of nanomaterials grouped by similar physical or chemical properties. Nanotubes have occupied a unique space in this field, primarily due to their high versatility in a wide range of biomedical applications. Although similar in morphology, members of this nanomaterial family widely differ in synthesis methods, mechanical and physiochemical properties, and therapeutic applications. As this field continues to develop, it is important to provide insight into novel biomaterial developments and their overall impact on current technology and therapeutics. In this review, we aim to characterize and compare two members of the nanotube family: carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and janus-base nanotubes (JBNts). While CNTs have been extensively studied for decades, JBNts provide a fresh perspective on many therapeutic modalities bound by the limitations of carbon-based nanomaterials. Herein, we characterize the morphology, synthesis, and applications of CNTs and JBNts to provide a comprehensive comparison between these nanomaterial technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.