Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35269691›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Recent Advances in the Production of Genome-Edited Rats.

Masahiro Sato, Shingo Nakamura, Emi Inada, Shuji Takabayashi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Methods for Modeling Early Life Stress in Rodents.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Masahiro SatoDepartment of Genome Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo 157-8535, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1334-2950
Shingo NakamuraDivision of Biomedical Engineering, National Defense Medical College Research Institute, Saitama 359-8513, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6084-0958
Emi InadaDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima 890-8544, Japan.
Shuji TakabayashiLaboratory Animal Facilities & Services, Preeminent Medical Photonics Education & Research Center, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 431-3192, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9268-3782
Hamamatsu University School of Medicine · JPKagoshima University · JPNational Center For Child Health and Development · JPNational Defense Medical College · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 16H05049Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 16K07087Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 21K10165Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 24580411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rat is an important animal model for understanding gene function and developing human disease models. Knocking out a gene function in rats was difficult until recently, when a series of genome editing (GE) technologies, including zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and the type II bacterial clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated Cas9 (CRISPR/Cas9) systems were successfully applied for gene modification (as exemplified by gene-specific knockout and knock-in) in the endogenous target genes of various organisms including rats. Owing to its simple application for gene modification and its ease of use, the CRISPR/Cas9 system is now commonly used worldwide. The most important aspect of this process is the selection of the method used to deliver GE components to rat embryos. In earlier stages, the microinjection (MI) of GE components into the cytoplasm and/or nuclei of a zygote was frequently employed. However, this method is associated with the use of an expensive manipulator system, the skills required to operate it, and the egg transfer (ET) of MI-treated embryos to recipient females for further development. In vitro electroporation (EP) of zygotes is next recognized as a simple and rapid method to introduce GE components to produce GE animals. Furthermore, in vitro transduction of rat embryos with adeno-associated viruses is potentially effective for obtaining GE rats. However, these two approaches also require ET. The use of gene-engineered embryonic stem cells or spermatogonial stem cells appears to be of interest to obtain GE rats; however, the procedure itself is difficult and laborious. Genome-editing via oviductal nucleic acids delivery (GONAD) (or improved GONAD (

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsNucleic AcidsAnimalsFemaleGene EditingGenomeHumansRatsTranscription Activator-Like Effector NucleasesZinc Finger NucleasesNucleic AcidsTranscription Activator-Like Effector NucleasesZinc Finger Nucleasesadeno-associated virusCRISPR/Cas9electroporationembryonic stem cellgenome editingGONAD/i-GONADmicroinjectionratsTALENsZFNs

Identifiers

PMID35269691
PMCPMC8910656
OpenAlexW4214664486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.