Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35269434›Full record

ReviewCells2022

Methods of Sputum and Mucus Assessment for Muco-Obstructive Lung Diseases in 2022: Time to "Unplug" from Our Daily Routine!

Jeremy Charriot, Mathilde Volpato, Aurélie Petit, Isabelle Vachier, Arnaud Bourdin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Modeling chronic infection withInfection and immunity · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Correlation ofInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeremy CharriotDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, CEDEX 5, 34295 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1420-5774
Mathilde VolpatoDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, CEDEX 5, 34295 Montpellier, France.
Aurélie PetitDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, CEDEX 5, 34295 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9069-9868
Isabelle VachierDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, CEDEX 5, 34295 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2730-5165
Arnaud BourdinDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, CEDEX 5, 34295 Montpellier, France.
Université de Montpellier · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obstructive lung diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, or non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, share some major pathophysiological features: small airway involvement, dysregulation of adaptive and innate pulmonary immune homeostasis, mucus hyperproduction, and/or hyperconcentration. Mucus regulation is particularly valuable from a therapeutic perspective given it contributes to airflow obstruction, symptom intensity, disease severity, and to some extent, disease prognosis in these diseases. It is therefore crucial to understand the mucus constitution of our patients, its behavior in a stable state and during exacerbation, and its regulatory mechanisms. These are all elements representing potential therapeutic targets, especially in the era of biologics. Here, we first briefly discuss the composition and characteristics of sputum. We focus on mucus and mucins, and then elaborate on the different sample collection procedures and how their quality is ensured. We then give an overview of the different direct analytical techniques available in both clinical routine and more experimental settings, giving their advantages and limitations. We also report on indirect mucus assessment procedures (questionnaires, high-resolution computed tomography scanning of the chest, lung function tests). Finally, we consider ways of integrating these techniques with current and future therapeutic options. Cystic fibrosis will not be discussed given its monogenic nature.

Indexed as

Cystic FibrosisPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveHumansLungMucusSputumasthmachronic obstructive pulmonary diseasemucinsmuco-obstructive lung diseasesmucusnon-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasisrheologysputum

Identifiers

PMID35269434
PMCPMC8909676
OpenAlexW4214612183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.