Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35269416›Full record

ArticleCells2022

Effects of the Mutant TP53 Reactivator APR-246 on Therapeutic Sensitivity of Pancreatic Cancer Cells in the Presence and Absence of WT-TP53.

Stephen L Abrams, Przemysław Duda, Shaw M Akula, Linda S Steelman, Matilde L Follo, Lucio Cocco, Stefano Ratti, Alberto M Martelli, Giuseppe Montalto, Maria Rita Emma and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Gain of Function (GOF) Mutant p53 in Cancer-Current Therapeutic Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Stephen L AbramsDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA.
Przemysław DudaDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Neurobiology, University of Wrocław, 50-335 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5207-4157
Shaw M AkulaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA.
Linda S SteelmanDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA.
Matilde L FolloDipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Neuromotorie, Università di Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy.
Lucio CoccoDipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Neuromotorie, Università di Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9206-8277
Stefano RattiDipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Neuromotorie, Università di Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6258-5345
Alberto M MartelliDipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Neuromotorie, Università di Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5196-7260
Giuseppe MontaltoDepartment of Health Promotion, Maternal and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Maria Rita EmmaInstitute for Biomedical Research and Innovation, National Research Council (CNR), 90146 Palermo, Italy.
Melchiorre CervelloInstitute for Biomedical Research and Innovation, National Research Council (CNR), 90146 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4923-7220
Dariusz RakusDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Neurobiology, University of Wrocław, 50-335 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3511-0459
Agnieszka GizakDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Neurobiology, University of Wrocław, 50-335 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9367-0270
James A McCubreyDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6027-3156
East Carolina University · USUniversity of Bologna · ITInstitute for Biomedical Research and Innovation · ITUniversity of Wrocław · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The TP53 tumor suppressor is mutated in ~75% of pancreatic cancers. The mutant TP53 protein in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) promotes tumor growth and metastasis. Attempts have been made to develop molecules that restore at least some of the properties of wild-type (WT) TP53. APR-246 is one such molecule, and it is referred to as a mutant TP53 reactivator. To understand the potential of APR-246 to sensitize PDAC cells to chemotherapy, we introduced a vector encoding WT-TP53 into two PDAC cell lines, one lacking the expression of TP53 (PANC-28) and one with a gain-of-function (GOF) mutant TP53 (MIA-PaCa-2). APR-246 increased drug sensitivity in the cells containing either a WT or mutant TP53 protein with GOF activity, but not in cells that lacked TP53. The introduction of WT-T53 into PANC-28 cells increased their sensitivity to the TP53 reactivator, chemotherapeutic drugs, and signal transduction inhibitors. The addition of WT-TP53 to PDAC cells with GOF TP53 also increased their sensitivity to the drugs and therapeutics, indicating that APR-246 could function in cells with WT-TP53 and GOF TP53. These results highlight the importance of knowledge of the type of TP53 mutation that is present in cancer patients before the administration of drugs which function through the reactivation of TP53.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorHumansQuinuclidinesTumor Suppressor Protein p53eprenetapoptQuinuclidinesTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53mutant TP53 reactivatorsnutlin-3aPDACtargeted therapyTP53

Identifiers

PMID35269416
PMCPMC8909756
OpenAlexW4213450043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.