Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35269397›Full record

ArticleCells2022

Combining HDAC and MEK Inhibitors with Radiation against Glioblastoma-Derived Spheres.

Eno I Essien, Thomas P Hofer, Michael J Atkinson, Nataša Anastasov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. MEK Inhibition in Glioblastoma: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Radio-sensitizing effect of MEK inhibition in glioblastoma in vitro and in vivo.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eno I EssienInstitute of Biological and Medical Imaging, Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4257-4398
Thomas P HoferImmunoanalytics Research Group Tissue Control of Immunocytes & Core Facility, German Research Center for Environmental Health, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9713-3138
Michael J AtkinsonChair of Radiation Biology, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany.
Nataša AnastasovInstitute of Biological and Medical Imaging, Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4088-1119
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma stem-like cells (GSLCs) in glioblastoma limit effective treatment and promote therapeutic resistance and tumor recurrence. Using a combined radiation and drug-screening platform, we tested the combination of a histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) and MAPK/ERK kinase inhibitor (MEKi) with radiation to predict the efficacy against GSLCs. To mimic a stem-like phenotype, glioblastoma-derived spheres were used and treated with a combination of HDACi (MS-275) and MEKi (TAK-733 or trametinib) with 4 Gy irradiation. The sphere-forming ability after the combined radiochemotherapy was investigated using a sphere formation assay, while the expression levels of the GSLC markers (CD44, Nestin and SOX2) after treatment were analyzed using Western blotting and flow cytometry. The combined radiochemotherapy treatment inhibited the sphere formation in both glioblastoma-derived spheres, decreased the expression of the GSLC markers in a cell-line dependent manner and increased the dead cell population. Finally, we showed that the combined treatment with radiation was more effective at reducing the GSLC markers compared to the standard treatment of temozolomide and radiation. These results suggest that combining HDAC and MEK inhibition with radiation may offer a new strategy to improve the treatment of glioblastoma.

Indexed as

GlioblastomaCell Line, TumorHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHumansMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProtein Kinase InhibitorsTemozolomideHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesProtein Kinase InhibitorsTemozolomidecombination therapyglioblastomaglioblastoma-derived spheresHDAC inhibitorMEK inhibitorradiation

Identifiers

PMID35269397
PMCPMC8909581
OpenAlexW4213359540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.