Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35268793›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Antibacterial Activity of Chinese Red Propolis against

Wenwen Zhang, Gomez Escalada Margarita, Di Wu, Wenqin Yuan, Sha Yan, Suzhen Qi, Xiaofeng Xue, Kai Wang, Liming Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Antibacterial activity of Chinese propolis and its synergy with β-lactams against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Wenwen ZhangInstitute of Apicultural Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100094, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2122-5618
Gomez Escalada MargaritaSchool of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS1 3HE, UK.
Di WuCollege of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultrual University, Jinzhong 030801, China.
Wenqin YuanSchool of Life Science, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252000, China.
Sha YanInstitute of Apicultural Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100094, China.
Suzhen QiInstitute of Apicultural Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100094, China.
Xiaofeng XueInstitute of Apicultural Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100094, China.
Kai WangInstitute of Apicultural Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100094, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0553-5293
Liming WuInstitute of Apicultural Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100094, China.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNLeeds Beckett University · GBLiaocheng University · CNShanxi Agricultural University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32172791Special project of national bee industry technical system CARS-44
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The antibacterial activity of propolis has long been of great interest, and the chemical composition of propolis is directly dependent on its source. We recently obtained a type of propolis from China with a red color. Firstly, the antibacterial properties of this unusual propolis were determined against Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Studies on its composition identified and quantified 14 main polyphenols of Chinese red propolis extracts (RPE); quantification was carried out using liquid chromatography triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry (LC-QQQ-MS/MS) and RPE was found to be rich in pinobanksin, pinobanksin-3-acetate, and chrysin. In vitro investigations of its antibacterial activity revealed that its activity against S. aureus and MRSA is due to disruption of the cell wall and cell membrane, which then inhibits bacterial growth. Despite its similar antibacterial activities against S. aureus and MRSA, metabolomic analysis further revealed the effects of RPE on bacteria metabolism were different. The untargeted metabolomic results showed that a total of 7 metabolites in 12 metabolic pathways had significant changes (Fold change > 2, p < 0.05 *) after RPE treatment in S. aureus, while 11 metabolites in 9 metabolic pathways had significant changes (Fold change > 2, p < 0.05 *) after RPE treated on MRSA. Furthermore, RPE downregulated several specific genes related to bacterial biofilm formation, autolysis, cell wall synthesis, and bacterial virulence in MRSA. In conclusion, the data obtained indicate that RPE may be a promising therapeutic agent against S. aureus and MRSA.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusPropolisStaphylococcus aureusChinaMetabolomicsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPolyphenolsTandem Mass SpectrometryAnti-Bacterial AgentsPolyphenolsPropolisantibacterial activityantibacterial mechanismChinese red propolismetabolomics

Identifiers

PMID35268793
PMCPMC8911571
OpenAlexW4221060774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.