Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35268408›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Implementation of the Publicly Funded Prenatal Screening Programme in Poland during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Bartosz Czuba, Jakub Mlodawski, Anna Kajdy, Dorota Sys, Wojciech Cnota, Marta Mlodawska, Sebastian Kwiatkowski, Pawel Guzik, Miroslaw Wielgos, Magda Rybak-Krzyszkowska and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Bartosz CzubaChair and Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 41-703 Ruda Śląska, Poland.
Jakub MlodawskiCollegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, 25-369 Kielce, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5740-9822
Anna KajdyDepartment of Reproductive Health, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-004 Warsaw, Poland.
Dorota SysDepartment of Reproductive Health, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-004 Warsaw, Poland.
Wojciech CnotaChair and Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 41-703 Ruda Śląska, Poland.
Marta MlodawskaCollegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, 25-369 Kielce, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8867-7638
Sebastian KwiatkowskiDepartment Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pommeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.
Pawel GuzikClinical Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, City Hospital, 35-241 Rzeszów, Poland.
Miroslaw Wielgos1st Department of Obstetrics and Genocology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-015 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2581-3668
Magda Rybak-KrzyszkowskaDepartment of Obstetrics and Perinatology, University Hospital in Krakow, 31-501 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6993-8078
Anna FuchsChair and Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Oncological Gynecology, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 40-211 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6439-4879
Grzegorz SwierczCollegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, 25-369 Kielce, Poland.
Dariusz BorowskiDepartment of Perinatology, Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, The Faculty of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Coeprnicus University, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7645-7371
Jan Kochanowski University · PLMedical University of Silesia · PLPostgraduate School of Molecular Medicine · PLKrakow Cardiovascular Research Institute · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PLNicolaus Copernicus University · PLPomeranian Medical University · PLUniversity of Rzeszów · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 affected the entire healthcare system in Poland, causing medical personnel to be relocated to other duties and limiting patients’ contacts with healthcare professionals. A large part of the planned diagnostics and treatment was delayed due to lack of equipment and personnel. Against this background, we analysed the implementation of the publicly funded prenatal screening programme (PSP) in Poland compared to the previous year. This is a cross-sectional study. We used nationwide datasets on the implementation of the prenatal testing programme over the period 2019−2020, datasets from the Statistics Poland on birth and the data on the development of the COVID-19 epidemic in Poland. In the year 2020, we observed a 12.41% decrease in woman enrolled to the programme compared to 2019. However, the decrease concerned only women under 35 years of age. With respect to the number of deliveries in the calendar year, the number of patients enrolled in the programme decreased by 3% (31% vs. 34%, p < 0.001). We also observed an increase in estriol measurements per the number of patients included in the programme, and a reduction in the number of PAPP-A tests in the first trimester, which proves an increased share of the triple test in the prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal aberrations. With respect to the number of deliveries, the number of amniocentesis procedures performed under PSP decreased by 0.19% (1.8% vs. 1.99%, p < 0.0001). In 2020, compared to the previous year, the number of patients included in the prenatal testing programme in Poland decreased. In terms of the number of births in Poland, the number of integrated screening tests also decreased, at the expense of increasing the percentage of triple tests. There were also significant reductions in the number of invasive diagnostic tests.

Indexed as

COVID-19pregnancyprenatal screening

Identifiers

PMID35268408
PMCPMC8911175
OpenAlexW4214703805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.