Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35268402›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Oncofertility and Reproductive Counseling in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Simona Zaami, Rossella Melcarne, Renato Patrone, Giuseppe Gullo, Francesca Negro, Gabriele Napoletano, Marco Monti, Valerio Aceti, Alessandra Panarese, Maria Carola Borcea and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Counseling and use of surrogacy among cancer survivors (CUSACS).Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Oncologists' current perspective and barriers to men's fertility preservation: a nationwide study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Simona ZaamiDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopedic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5741-7139
Rossella MelcarneDepartment of Surgical Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2820-7607
Renato PatroneICTUS, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6969-4157
Giuseppe GulloIn Vitro Fertilization Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Villa Sofia Cervello Hospital, University of Palermo, 90146 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4269-4269
Francesca NegroDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopedic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2966-1112
Gabriele NapoletanoDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopedic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Marco MontiDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9592-1245
Valerio AcetiDepartment of Translational and Precision Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Alessandra PanareseGeneral and Transplant Surgery Department, Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche Applicate e Biotecnologiche (DISCAB), University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Maria Carola BorceaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Chiara ScorzielloDepartment of Surgical Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Luca VentroneDepartment of Surgical Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Samira Nicole MamedovDepartment of Surgical Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Maria Letizia MeggioriniDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Massimo VergineDepartment of Surgical Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8433-685X
Laura GiacomelliDepartment of Surgical Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3598-7522
Sapienza University of Rome · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · ITOspedale Vincenzo Cervello · ITUniversity of L'Aquila · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionImproving the prognosis of breast cancer patients is of utmost importance in terms of increasing survival rates. Modern medicine has therefore prioritized better quality of life for patients, even after the disease, through a better management of the potential long-term side effects induced by anticancer treatments. Fertility preservation and family planning are therefore crucial issues to be addressed in all cancer patients of reproductive age. Along those lines, a new branch of medicine with distinct multidisciplinary characteristics has developed over the years: oncofertility. Although both national and international guidelines value reproductive counseling as an essential aspect of the diagnostic-therapeutic pathway, part and parcel of the informed consent process, it is not included within the protocols adopted by the operating units for the care and management of neoplastic diseases.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the activity of the Breast Unit of the Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy, and the degree of compliance with guidelines. By knowing the strengths and weaknesses of such approaches, the standards of care offered to breast cancer patients can be improved. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective study based on a review of medical records was conducted between 2014 and 2021. Patients under 40 years of age diagnosed with non-metastatic malignancies were included who received chemotherapy treatment, namely neoadjuvant, adjuvant or adjuvant hormone therapy.

resultsThe data were extracted from the medical records of 51 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 41% of whom received reproductive counseling, and of these, 43% decided to undertake a path of fertility preservation. Factors such as the absence of children and young age reportedly favored both the interest in counseling proposals by the medical staff and the decision to undertake a path of fertility preservation.

conclusionsThe study shows that there has been growing interest in the topic of oncofertility, especially in light of law 219/2017. Therefore, since 2018, multiple proposals for reproductive counseling have been set forth, but there was not an equally growing demand for fertility preservation practices, which can be explained by the invasive nature of such practices, the patients' concern about their own state of health, and poor or inadequate information. Such impediments highlight the importance of standardized counseling and the need for a multidisciplinary medical team to support the patient in the decision-making process. The study also revealed a drop in the number of patients receiving counseling due to the COVID-19 pandemic, contrary to the positive trend that was recorded prior to the pandemic.

Indexed as

breast cancercounselingmedicolegal issuesoncofertilityrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID35268402
PMCPMC8911138
OpenAlexW4214775822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.