ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Outcomes of Vitrectomy with Fovea-Sparing and Inverted ILM Flap Technique for Myopic Foveoschisis.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A technique of TA-assisted ILM peeling for myopic foveoschisis.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Comparison of the effectiveness of vitrectomy with silicone oil or perfluoropropane tamponade for myopic foveoschisis with foveal detachment.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- The Association Between the Retinal Sequelae of Myopia and Glaucoma in a Global Cohort.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Myopic traction maculopathy in fovea-involved myopic chorioretinal atrophy.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- Fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling with inverted flap technique versus standard internal limiting membrane peeling for symptomatic myopic foveoschisis.Scientific reports · 2024Observational
- Anatomical and visual outcomes of fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling with or without inverted flap technique for myopic foveoschisis.BMC ophthalmology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical treatment of myopic foveoschisis (MF) can result in a macular hole in 11−17% of patients that may lead to poor visual outcomes and progression to macular hole retinal detachment. We evaluated the benefit of vitrectomy to treat MF using the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap and fovea-sparing ILM techniques. We studied 20 eyes of 20 patients (7 men, 13 women) with high MF (mean axial length, 29.3 ± 1.7 mm). MF was classified by optical coherence tomography findings: retinoschisis (7 eyes) or foveal detachment (13 eyes). Between October 2013 and June 2021, we performed vitreous surgery in all 20 patients, employing both techniques. Air tamponade was used in 4 eyes, SF6 gas in 10 eyes, and C3F8 gas in 6 eyes. All patients stayed in the face-down position for one full day postoperatively. Visual acuity and foveal contour were analyzed using optical coherence tomography before surgery and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. LogMAR visual acuity was 0.46 before surgery, with a significant improvement at 3 months (0.34) and at 6 months (0.2) postoperatively (p = 0.024, p < 0.001, respectively). In all patients, the foveal contour showed improvement without macular hole formation after surgery. These results show that vitrectomy, performed using the inverted ILM flap and fovea-sparing ILM technique, is effective for treating MF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.