Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35268322›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Relief Effect of Carbon Dioxide Insufflation in Transnasal Endoscopy for Health Checks-A Prospective, Double-Blind, Case-Control Trial.

Toshio Fujisawa, Hiroshi Fukuda, Naoto Sakamoto, Mariko Hojo, Ko Tomishima, Shigeto Ishii, Hirohide Yokokawa, Mizue Saita, Toshio Naito, Akihito Nagahara and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Toshio FujisawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7367-0767
Hiroshi FukudaDepartment of General Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1072-3021
Naoto SakamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2143-0734
Mariko HojoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
Ko TomishimaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6206-9236
Shigeto IshiiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4151-7765
Hirohide YokokawaDepartment of General Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
Mizue SaitaDepartment of General Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
Toshio NaitoDepartment of General Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1646-9930
Akihito NagaharaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
Sumio WatanabeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
Hiroyuki IsayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3308-9326
Juntendo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CO2 insufflation has proven effective in reducing patients’ pain after colonoscopies but has not been examined in esophagogastroduodenoscopies. Therefore, we examined the effect of CO2 insufflation in examinees who underwent transnasal endoscopies without sedation. This study is a single-center, prospective, double-blind, case-control trial conducted between March 2017 and August 2018. Subjects were assigned weekly to receive insufflation with either CO2 or air. The primary outcome was improvement of abdominal pain and distension at 2 h and 1-day postprocedure. In total, 336 and 338 examinees were assigned to the CO2 and air groups, respectively. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores for abdominal distension (15.4 vs. 25.5; p < 0.001) and distress from flatus (16.0 vs. 28.8; p < 0.001) at 2 h postprocedure were significantly reduced in the CO2 group. VAS scores for pain during the procedure (33.5 vs. 37.1; p = 0.059) and abdominal pain after the procedure (3.9 vs. 5.7; p = 0.052) also tended to be lower at 2 h postprocedure, but all parameters showed no significant difference at 1-day postprocedure. All procedures were safely completed through the planned program, and no apparent adverse events requiring treatment or follow-up occurred. In conclusion, CO2 insufflation may reduce postprocedural abdominal discomfort from transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopies. (UMIN000028543).

Indexed as

abdominal distentionabdominal paincarbon dioxideCO2 insufflationhealth checktransnasal endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID35268322
PMCPMC8911034
OpenAlexW4213439900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.