ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022
Update on Management of Cardiovascular Diseases in Women.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perspectives on sex and gender inclusion in clinical practice guidelines: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Women's Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke Risk Stratification Using a Precision and Personalized Framework Embedded with an Explainable Artificial Intelligence Paradigm: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Peripheral Artery Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Cohort Profile: A Descriptive Analysis of Patients Aged 75 Years and Older with Public Health Coverage in Madrid at Baseline, Including a 5-Year Preobservational Period (2015-2019).Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in Women.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- On Counterfactual Explanations of Cardiovascular Risk in Adolescent and Young Adult Breast Cancer Survivors.Journal of medical systems · 2025Article
- Salt sensitivity of blood pressure: mechanisms and sex-specific differences.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025Review
- Gender Disparities in Ischemic Heart Disease Management: Underdiagnosis in Women and Differences in Treatment.Cureus · 2025Review
- Assessing the effect of hypertension on the severity of coronary artery lesions in young female with acute coronary syndrome.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Women's Improvements in Cardiorespiratory Fitness Following Cardiac Rehabilitation Differ by Body Mass Index Category.CJC open · 2025Article
- Nonlinear relationships between the triglyceride glucose-body mass index and cardiovascular disease in middle-aged and elderly women from NHANES (1999-2018).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Gender disparities in delayed angina diagnosis: insights from 2001-2020 NHANES data.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Elderly Patients: A Whole New Ballgame?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Acute Coronary Syndrome in Elderly Patients: How to Tackle Them?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Awareness and knowledge of cardiovascular disease and their associations with the lifestyles of 8-16-year-old girls: a perspective from Saudi Arabia.BMC public health · 2024Article
- A Look at Primary and Secondary Prevention in the Elderly: The Two Sides of the Same Coin.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- A Comprehensive Geriatric Workup and Frailty Assessment in Older Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Exploring the Perioperative Use of DOACs, off the Beaten Track.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists Position Paper 'Gender discrepancy: time to implement gender-based clinical management'.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) have a lower prevalence in women than men; although, a higher mortality rate and a poorer prognosis are more common in women. However, there is a misperception of CVD female risk since women have commonly been considered more protected so that the real threat is vastly underestimated. Consequently, female patients are more likely to be treated less aggressively, and a lower rate of diagnostic and interventional procedures is performed in women than in men. In addition, there are substantial sex differences in CVD, so different strategies are needed. This review aims to evaluate the main gender-specific approaches in CVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.