Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35268197›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Disentangling the Legal and Illegal Wildlife Trade-Insights from Indonesian Wildlife Market Surveys.

Vincent Nijman, Thais Q Morcatty, Kim Feddema, Marco Campera, K A I Nekaris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Threatened synanthropes depend on intact forests: a critical evaluation of Moore et al. (2023).Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Is biomedical research demand driving a monkey business?One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Wildlife Crime: Issues and Promising Solutions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vincent NijmanOxford Wildlife Trade Research Group, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5600-4276
Thais Q MorcattyOxford Wildlife Trade Research Group, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3095-7052
Kim FeddemaBusiness School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8680-4522
Marco CamperaOxford Wildlife Trade Research Group, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2643-8329
K A I NekarisOxford Wildlife Trade Research Group, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5523-7353

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is challenging to disentangle the legal and illegal aspects of wild-caught animals that are traded in wildlife markets or online, and this may diminish the value of conducting wildlife trade surveys. We present empirical studies on the trade in birds (ducks, owls, songbirds, non-passerines) in Indonesia (2005 to 2021). Based on visits to wildlife markets, wholesale traders, and monitoring of an Instagram account, we examine if five specific pieces of legislation (domestic and international) are adhered to: (1) protected species, (2) harvest quota, (3) welfare, (4) provincial transport restrictions, and (5) illegal import of CITES-listed species. Our five distinctly different case studies showed that in each case, certain rules and regulations were adhered to, whilst others were violated to varying degrees. When trade involved non-protected species, there was frequently a lack of harvest quotas or trade occurred above these allocated quotas. Basic welfare provisions were regularly and habitually violated. Visiting wildlife markets and recording first-hand what is openly offered for sale is a highly reliable, verifiable, and valuable method of data collection that can give insight in numerous aspects of the animal trade. Our research provides support for recognising the urgency for the government to take appropriate action to curb all the illegal aspects of the bird trade in Indonesia.

Indexed as

Asian Songbird CrisisCITESconservationillegal wildlife tradeIndonesiasocial media

Identifiers

PMID35268197
PMCPMC8909552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.