Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35268157›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Influence of Maternal Protein Restriction in Primiparous Beef Heifers during Mid- and/or Late-Gestation on Progeny Feedlot Performance and Carcass Characteristics.

Janna J Block, Megan J Webb, Keith R Underwood, Michael G Gonda, Adele A Harty, Robin R Salverson, Rick N Funston, Kenneth C Olson, Amanda D Blair

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Janna J BlockHettinger Research Extension Center, North Dakota State University, Hettinger, ND 58639, USA.
Megan J WebbDepartment of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.
Keith R UnderwoodDepartment of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0696-0785
Michael G GondaDepartment of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.
Adele A HartyDepartment of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.
Robin R SalversonDepartment of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.
Rick N FunstonWest Central Research & Extension Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, North Platte, NE 69101, USA.
Kenneth C OlsonDepartment of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.
Amanda D BlairDepartment of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.
South Dakota State University · USNorth Dakota State University · USUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · US

Funding

South Dakota Beef Industry Council 3x4504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the impacts of metabolizable protein (MP) restriction in primiparous heifers during mid- and/or late-gestation on progeny performance and carcass characteristics. Heifers were allocated to 12 pens in a randomized complete block design. The factorial treatment structure included two stages of gestation (mid- and late-) and two levels of dietary protein (control (CON); ~101% of MP requirements and restricted (RES); ~80% of MP requirements). Half of the pens on each treatment were randomly reassigned to the other treatment at the end of mid-gestation. Progeny were finished in a GrowSafe feeding system and carcass measurements were collected. Gestation treatment x time interactions indicated that MP restriction negatively influenced heifer body weight (BW), body condition score, and longissimus muscle (LM) area (p < 0.05), but not fat thickness (p > 0.05). Treatment did not affect the feeding period, initial or final BW, dry matter intake, or average daily gain of progeny (p > 0.05). The progeny of dams on the RES treatment in late gestation had a greater LM area (p = 0.04), but not when adjusted on a hot carcass weight basis (p > 0.10). Minimal differences in the animal performance and carcass characteristics suggest that the level of MP restriction imposed during mid- and late-gestation in this study did not have a significant developmental programming effect.

Indexed as

beefcarcassfeedlot performancefetal programmingmaternal nutrient restrictionmetabolizable protein

Identifiers

PMID35268157
PMCPMC8909653
OpenAlexW4214742839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.