Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35268149›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

The Effect of Different Preoperative Depilation Ways on the Healing of Wounded Skin in Mice.

Xinyi He, Lintao Jia, Xiao Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. An Experimental Model of Proton-Beam-Induced Radiation Dermatitis In Vivo.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xinyi HeDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Fourth Military Medical University, 169 West Changle Road, Xi'an 710032, China.
Lintao JiaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Fourth Military Medical University, 169 West Changle Road, Xi'an 710032, China.
Xiao ZhangDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Fourth Military Medical University, 169 West Changle Road, Xi'an 710032, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7842-9489

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81903149The Medical and Health science and technology Foundation of Sanya 2019YW19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hair removal is necessary before operating on animals with dense hair layers. To provide an appropriate hair removal method and maintain animal welfare, we introduced four commonly used depilation methods-namely, scissors shearing, electric shaving, depilatory cream, and sodium sulfide, and made systematic comparisons, instead of only examining one or two methods, as reported in the past. To further assess convenience and possible effects on skin wound healing, we performed a skin trauma model after depilation in C57BL/6J mice and recorded wound healing time. Meanwhile, the skin tissues around the wound were stained with H&E and Masson. The results showed that the wound contraction rate of the sodium sulfide group was significantly lower than other groups at different points in time. Furthermore, depilatory cream and sodium sulfide methods could induce a topical inflammatory response on the third day after the operation and delay the regeneration of collagen fibers. We concluded that sodium sulfide depilatory has a significant negative effect on wound healing. Depilatory cream is gentler, with mild skin irritation and symptoms of inflammation. The electric shaving method is more convenient and safer, and thus could be the best choice for preoperative depilation.

Indexed as

C57BL/6J miceelectric shavinghair removalsodium sulfidesurgerywound healing

Identifiers

PMID35268149
PMCPMC8909386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.